§ 382.4.Notification of Connection of Relationship With Nonparty Recipient of Distribution
Title 3. Of the Parties to Civil Actions · Chapter 5. Permissive Joinder · Enacted 2018 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of § 382.4
Plain-English Summary
Class action settlements sometimes send leftover money to a nonparty — a nonprofit, a charity, a research fund — rather than back to class members. Section 382.4 addresses a specific risk that arrangement creates: what if the nonprofit chosen happens to have ties to the lawyers negotiating the settlement?
The section applies whenever a proposed settlement in a class action under § 382, including a consent judgment, decree, or settlement agreement, directs money or anything of value to someone who is not a party to the case. At the preliminary approval hearing required by rule 3.769(c) of the California Rules of Court, an attorney for a party must tell the court about any connection or relationship with the nonparty recipient that could reasonably create the appearance of impropriety between how the recipient was picked and the interests of the class.
This disclosure duty gives the judge reviewing preliminary approval the information needed to ask hard questions about a distribution to an outside recipient before signing off on it, rather than learning about a conflict after the settlement has already been approved.
Frequently Asked Questions
When does an attorney have to disclose a connection to a nonparty under § 382.4?
At the hearing for preliminary approval of a class action settlement, whenever the proposed settlement directs money or anything of value to a person or entity that is not a party to the case.
What kind of connection triggers the disclosure duty?
Any connection or relationship with the nonparty recipient that could reasonably create the appearance of impropriety between the selection of that recipient and the interests of the class.
Does § 382.4 apply to consent judgments and settlement agreements, or only to a final decree?
It applies to any of the three — a consent judgment, a decree, or a settlement agreement — so long as it provides for a distribution to a nonparty.
Why does California require this kind of disclosure?
Sending unclaimed settlement funds to an outside recipient only serves the class if the recipient is chosen for the class’s benefit, not because of the attorney’s own ties to that recipient, and this section is designed to surface that risk before the court approves the settlement.
Amendment History
Added by Stats 2018 ch 45 (SB 847),s 1, eff. 6/27/2018.