§ 285.4.Appointment of counsel upon withdrawal of legal service agency attorney; Recovery of attorneys’ fees and costs
Title 5. Persons Specially Invested With Ministerial Powers Relating to Courts of Justice · Chapter 1. Attorneys and Counselors at Law · Enacted 1983 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of § 285.4
Plain-English Summary
Once a legal service agency attorney withdraws under § 285.2, someone may still need to step in. § 285.4 lets the court appoint any member of the bar, law firm, or professional law corporation to represent the client without compensation, on a showing of good cause.
The section lists eight factors the court may weigh in deciding good cause: the probable merit of the client’s claim, the client’s financial ability to pay for counsel, the availability of alternative representation, the risk of irreparable prejudice without counsel, the appointed counsel’s ability to represent the client effectively, the attorney’s or firm’s recent pro bono record, the client’s own ability to self-represent, and the appointed attorney’s workload.
Appointment without compensation does not mean the attorney works entirely for free forever — the section preserves the appointed attorney’s ability to recover attorneys’ fees and costs the client is otherwise entitled to under the law.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a court force an attorney to represent an indigent client for free?
§ 285.4 lets the court appoint a bar member, firm, or professional law corporation to represent the client without compensation, but only on a good-cause showing weighed against the section’s listed factors.
Can an attorney appointed under § 285.4 still recover fees later?
Yes. Appointment without compensation does not bar the attorney from recovering attorneys’ fees and costs the client is otherwise entitled to by law.
What factors does a court weigh before appointing counsel under § 285.4?
Among others: the claim’s probable merit, the client’s finances, available alternative representation, the risk of prejudice, and the prospective attorney’s workload and recent pro bono work.
Amendment History
Added Stats 1983 ch 279 § 3.