§ 262.3.Execution of unexecuted process by sheriff’s successor
Title 4. Ministerial Officers of Courts of Justice · Chapter 1. Of Ministerial Officers Generally · Enacted 1951 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of § 262.3
Plain-English Summary
Process does not expire just because the sheriff holding it leaves office. § 262.3 covers three ways a sheriff’s tenure can end mid-assignment — death, resignation, or the simple expiration of a term — and in each case hands the unfinished work to whoever succeeds to the office.
The rule reaches partial performance as well as total inaction: process “unexecuted, in whole or in part” at the moment of transition passes to the successor. A levy half completed does not have to start over, and a writ never touched does not need to be reissued.
For anyone relying on the sheriff’s office to enforce a judgment, this section means a change in personnel is not a reason to re-serve or refile. The duty travels with the office, not the individual who held it.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens to a pending writ if the sheriff leaves office before finishing it?
§ 262.3 requires the sheriff’s successor in office to execute any process left unexecuted, in whole or in part, at the time of the transition.
Does this rule apply only when a sheriff dies in office?
No. § 262.3 covers death, resignation, and expiration of a term of office alike.
Does partial completion of a levy matter under this section?
§ 262.3 expressly covers process left unexecuted “in whole or in part,” so partially completed work also passes to the successor.
Do parties need to re-serve or reissue a writ when a new sheriff takes office?
No. § 262.3 transfers the duty to complete unexecuted process automatically to the successor in office.
Amendment History
Added Stats 1951 ch 655 § 14.