§ 2033.280.Failure to serve timely response; waiver of objections;
Title 4. Civil Discovery Act · Chapter 16. Requests for Admission · Article 2. Response to Requests for Admission · Last amended 2005 · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 2033.280
Plain-English Summary
Missing the response deadline in Section 2033.250 carries a sharper cost for requests for admission than it does for most other discovery methods. A party who fails to serve a timely response waives every objection it might otherwise have raised, including privilege and work-product objections that would normally be available. That waiver applies automatically the moment the deadline passes without a timely response.
The waiver is not necessarily permanent. On motion, a court may relieve the responding party from it, but only on a two-part showing: the party has since served a response that substantially complies with Sections 2033.210 through 2033.230, and the original failure to respond on time resulted from mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect rather than deliberate delay. Absent that relief, the requesting party can move for an order that the genuineness of the documents and the truth of the matters specified in the requests be deemed admitted outright, along with a monetary sanction. The court must grant that order unless the responding party has served, before the hearing, a proposed response substantially complying with Section 2033.220, and a monetary sanction against whoever caused the motion is mandatory regardless of how the deemed-admitted request comes out.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does a party lose by failing to serve a timely response to requests for admission?
It waives any objection to the requests, including privilege and work-product objections.
Can a court excuse a late response and restore the waived objections?
Yes, on motion, if the party has since served a response substantially complying with Sections 2033.210 through 2033.230 and the delay resulted from mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect.
What can the requesting party do if no timely response was served?
Move for an order that the genuineness of the documents and the truth of the matters in the requests be deemed admitted, along with a monetary sanction.
Can the responding party still avoid having the matters deemed admitted?
Yes, by serving a proposed response substantially complying with Section 2033.220 before the hearing on the motion, though a monetary sanction is still mandatory.
Amendment History
(Added by Stats.2004, c. 182 (A.B.3081), § 23, operative July 1, 2005. Amended by Stats.2005, c. 294 (A.B.333), § 12.)