RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 2030.290.Failure to serve timely response; waiver of rights; motion for relief from

Title 4. Civil Discovery Act · Chapter 13. Written Interrogatories · Article 2. Response to Interrogatories · Enacted 2004 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 2030.290 provides that a party who fails to serve a timely response to interrogatories waives the option to produce writings and every objection, subject to discretionary relief where the party later substantially complies and the delay resulted from mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect, and lets the propounding party move to compel a response, with a mandatory sanction against whoever loses that motion.

Full Text of § 2030.290

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c)

If a party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a timely response, the following rules apply:
(a) The party to whom the interrogatories are directed waives any right to exercise the option to produce writings under Section 2030.230, as well as any objection to the interrogatories, including one based on privilege or on the protection for work product under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 2018.010). The court, on motion, may relieve that party from this waiver on its determination that both of the following conditions are satisfied:
(1) The party has subsequently served a response that is in substantial compliance with Sections 2030.210, 2030.220, 2030.230, and 2030.240.
(2) The party's failure to serve a timely response was the result of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect.
(b) The party propounding the interrogatories may move for an order compelling response to the interrogatories.
(c) The court shall impose a monetary sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010) against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel a response to interrogatories, unless it finds that the one subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. If a party then fails to obey an order compelling answers, the court may make those orders that are just, including the imposition of an issue sanction, an evidence sanction, or a terminating sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010). In lieu of or in addition to that sanction, the court may impose a monetary sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010).

Plain-English Summary

Missing the response deadline in Section 2030.260 carries a real cost under this section, not just a late filing. A party who fails to serve a timely response waives two things outright: the option under Section 2030.230 to point to business records instead of answering directly, and every objection it might otherwise have raised, including privilege and work-product objections that would normally be available. That waiver applies automatically the moment the deadline passes without a timely response, without any need for the propounding party to do anything first.

The waiver is not necessarily permanent. On motion, a court may relieve the responding party from it, but only on a two-part showing: the party has since served a response that substantially complies with the format and content rules in Sections 2030.210 through 2030.240, and the original failure to respond on time resulted from mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect rather than deliberate delay or indifference. Absent that relief, the propounding party can move to compel a response to the interrogatories outright, and subdivision (c) makes the consequences of that motion pointed: the court must impose a monetary sanction under Chapter 7 against whichever side loses the motion, unless that side acted with substantial justification or a sanction would otherwise be unjust, and if the responding party still disobeys an order compelling answers, the court can escalate to an issue, evidence, or even terminating sanction, on top of or instead of a further monetary sanction.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does a party lose by failing to serve a timely response to interrogatories?

It waives the option to produce writings under Section 2030.230 and any objection to the interrogatories, including privilege and work-product objections.

Can a court excuse a late response and restore the waived rights?

Yes, on motion, if the party has since served a response substantially complying with Sections 2030.210 through 2030.240 and the delay resulted from mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect.

What can the propounding party do if no timely response was served?

Move for an order compelling a response to the interrogatories.

Is a sanction automatic on a motion to compel a response under this section?

Generally yes. The court must impose a monetary sanction against whoever unsuccessfully makes or opposes the motion, unless that party acted with substantial justification or the sanction would otherwise be unjust.

What happens if a party disobeys a court order compelling a response?

The court may impose an issue, evidence, or terminating sanction under Chapter 7, in addition to or instead of a further monetary sanction.

Amendment History

(Added by Stats.2004, c. 182 (A.B.3081), § 23, operative July 1, 2005.) WESTLAW © 2026 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1 § 2030.290. Failure to serve timely response; waiver of rights; motion for relief from waiver; motion..., CA CIV PRO § 2030.290

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from the West's Annotated California Codes / Thomson Reuters. Enacted by the California Legislature. Last verified July 29, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: ccp 2030.290 waiver of objections late responsemotion to compel response to interrogatories californiaexcusable neglect late interrogatory response