RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 2030.220.Answers in response; form and content; obligations of responding party

Title 4. Civil Discovery Act · Chapter 13. Written Interrogatories · Article 2. Response to Interrogatories · Enacted 2004 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 2030.220 requires every interrogatory answer to be as complete and direct as the responding party's reasonably available information permits, to be answered to the extent possible even when a full answer cannot be given, and, where personal knowledge is lacking, to reflect a reasonable, good-faith inquiry to others unless the information is equally available to the party who asked.

Full Text of § 2030.220

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c)

(a) Each answer in a response to interrogatories shall be as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits.
(b) If an interrogatory cannot be answered completely, it shall be answered to the extent possible.
(c) If the responding party does not have personal knowledge sufficient to respond fully to an interrogatory, that party shall so state, but shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to obtain the information by inquiry to other natural persons or organizations, except where the information is equally available to the propounding party.

Plain-English Summary

This section sets the quality standard every interrogatory answer has to meet, regardless of subject matter. An answer must be as complete and direct as the information reasonably available to the responding party allows, a standard that rules out evasive half-answers dressed up to look responsive while dodging the question underneath. Where a full answer is not possible, the responding party cannot refuse to answer outright; it has to answer to whatever extent it can, supplying the partial information it does have rather than withholding everything because it lacks everything.

Subdivision (c) addresses the common situation where the person answering does not personally know the answer. Lacking personal knowledge is not itself an excuse to leave a question blank. The responding party must say so, but it also has to make a reasonable and good-faith effort to track down the information from other people or organizations under its control or influence, employees, agents, or affiliated entities who might know. That inquiry obligation has one carve-out: it does not apply where the information sought is equally available to the propounding party in the first place, since there is little point making one side dig up what the other side can find just as readily on its own.

Frequently Asked Questions

What standard must an interrogatory answer meet?

It must be as complete and direct as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits.

Can a party refuse to answer an interrogatory just because it cannot answer completely?

No. If an interrogatory cannot be answered completely, it must still be answered to the extent possible.

What must a party do if it lacks personal knowledge to answer an interrogatory?

It must state that it lacks sufficient personal knowledge, but must also make a reasonable and good-faith effort to obtain the information by inquiry to other people or organizations.

Is there any exception to the duty to inquire when personal knowledge is lacking?

Yes. The duty to inquire does not apply where the information sought is equally available to the party who propounded the interrogatory.

Amendment History

(Added by Stats.2004, c. 182 (A.B.3081), § 23, operative July 1, 2005.)

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from the West's Annotated California Codes / Thomson Reuters. Enacted by the California Legislature. Last verified July 29, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: ccp 2030.220 complete interrogatory answer standardduty to inquire interrogatory answer californiaevasive incomplete answer interrogatory