§ 2025.440.Failure of deponent to attend after deposing party failed to serve
Title 4. Civil Discovery Act · Chapter 9. Oral Deposition Inside California · Article 4. Objections, Sanctions, Protective Orders, Motions to Compel, and Suspension of Depositions · Enacted 2004 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 2025.440
Plain-English Summary
Sometimes a deposition falls apart because the noticing party dropped the ball on paperwork, and sometimes it falls apart because the deponent ignored a validly served subpoena; this section treats those two failures differently. If a deponent does not appear because the noticing party never served the required deposition subpoena, the court must sanction the noticing party, that party's attorney, or both, in favor of any other party who showed up expecting the testimony to happen, unless substantial justification or some other circumstance excuses it.
The second half of the section flips the target. If a deposition subpoena was properly served and the deponent still does not show up, or shows up but refuses to take the oath, the court can turn instead to the sanctions specified in Section 2020.240, the nonparty-discovery provision addressing what happens when someone disobeys a subpoena, which can include treating the refusal as contempt.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if the noticing party never served the required subpoena and the deponent doesn't appear?
A mandatory monetary sanction against the noticing party or attorney, absent substantial justification.
What if the subpoena was served properly but the deponent doesn't show up or won't take the oath?
The court may impose the sanctions available under Section 2020.240, including contempt.
Who does the sanction in the first scenario benefit?
Any other party who attended expecting the testimony to be taken.
Amendment History
(Added by Stats.2004, c. 182 (A.B.3081), § 23, operative July 1, 2005.)