§ 1297.151.Termination Upon Withdrawal of Arbitrator
Title 9.3. Arbitration and Conciliation of International Commercial Disputes · Chapter 3. Composition of Arbitral Tribunals · Article 6. Termination of Mandate and Substitution of Arbitrators · Enacted 1988 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 1297.151
Plain-English Summary
Articles 4 and 5 give two structured paths to end an arbitrator's mandate: a successful challenge, or a failure-or-impossibility-to-act determination. This section adds a broader, catch-all path that doesn't depend on either one. An arbitrator's mandate also ends upon withdrawal from office for any reason -- not just the reasons those earlier articles address -- or by or under an agreement of the parties.
This is a practical safety valve. Arbitrators sometimes need to step down for ordinary reasons that have nothing to do with bias or incapacity: a scheduling conflict, a change in circumstances, or plain personal preference. Parties, too, may agree between themselves to replace an arbitrator without ever invoking a challenge or a failure-to-act claim. Either route ends the mandate just as effectively, opening the door to the substitution process in the rest of this article.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are challenge and failure-to-act the only ways an arbitrator's mandate can end?
No. Section 1297.151 recognizes that a mandate also ends when the arbitrator withdraws for any reason, or when the parties agree to end it, apart from the grounds addressed in Articles 4 and 5.
Does an arbitrator need a specific reason to withdraw under this section?
No. The section covers withdrawal for any reason, without requiring the kind of grounds a challenge or a failure-to-act claim would need.
What happens once a mandate ends under this section?
Section 1297.152 requires a substitute arbitrator to be appointed under the rules that applied to the original appointment.
Amendment History
Added by Stats. 1988, Ch. 23, Sec. 1. Effective March 7, 1988.