RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 1286.6.Grounds For Correcting Award

Title 9. Arbitration · Chapter 4. Enforcement of the Award · Article 1. Confirmation, Correction or Vacation of the Award · Enacted 1961 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 1286.6 lists the narrow grounds on which a court, instead of vacating the award, must correct it and confirm it as corrected -- an evident miscalculation or descriptive mistake, arbitrators exceeding their powers in a way correctable without affecting the merits, or an award imperfect in form.

Full Text of § 1286.6

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c)

Subject to Section 1286.8, the court, unless it vacates the award pursuant to Section 1286.2, shall correct the award and confirm it as corrected if the court determines that:
(a) There was an evident miscalculation of figures or an evident mistake in the description of any person, thing or property referred to in the award;
(b) The arbitrators exceeded their powers but the award may be corrected without affecting the merits of the decision upon the controversy submitted; or
(c) The award is imperfect in a matter of form, not affecting the merits of the controversy.

Plain-English Summary

Not every defect in an award calls for throwing it out entirely, and this section supplies the narrower fix. Subject to Section 1286.8's own procedural requirements, and unless the court instead vacates the award under Section 1286.2, the court corrects the award and confirms it as corrected if it finds any of three things: an evident miscalculation of figures or an evident mistake in describing a person, thing, or property referred to in the award; that the arbitrators exceeded their powers but the award can be corrected without affecting the merits of the decision on the controversy submitted; or that the award is imperfect in some matter of form that does not affect the merits of the controversy.

The second ground draws a direct line to Section 1286.2's vacation grounds. Both sections deal with arbitrators exceeding their powers -- the difference is whether the problem can be fixed without touching the merits. If it can, correction under this section is the remedy; if fixing it would require reworking the actual decision, vacation under Section 1286.2 is required instead.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between a correctable 'exceeded powers' problem and a vacation-worthy one?

If the award can be fixed without affecting the merits of the decision, it is corrected under this section; if fixing it would require touching the merits, it must be vacated under Section 1286.2 instead.

What counts as an 'evident miscalculation' under this section?

A clear error in figures, or a clear mistake in describing a person, thing, or property referred to in the award.

Does an award with a formatting problem get thrown out entirely?

No -- if the defect is just a matter of form and does not affect the merits, the court corrects it and confirms it as corrected rather than vacating it.

Amendment History

Added by Stats. 1961, Ch. 461.

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from the Deering's California Codes Annotated / vLex. Enacted by the California Legislature. Last verified July 29, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: grounds to correct arbitration award californiaevident miscalculation arbitration award