§ 1268.020.Failure to Timely Pay Full Amount Required By Judgment
Title 7. Eminent Domain Law · Chapter 11. Postjudgment Procedure · Article 1. Payment of Judgment; Final Order of Condemnation · Last amended 1980 · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 1268.020
Plain-English Summary
When the condemning agency misses the 30-day payment deadline in § 1268.010, this section gives the defendant two independent paths forward, and the defendant gets to pick either one without having to try the other first.
The first path is ordinary enforcement. If the agency is a public entity, the defendant enforces the judgment the way any judgment against a government body gets enforced under the Government Code. If the agency isn't a public entity, the defendant enforces it the way any civil judgment gets enforced.
The second path is more drastic: killing the proceeding outright. To get there, the defendant files and serves a written notice, by registered or certified mail, telling the agency it missed the deadline. If the agency still hasn't paid in full 20 days after that notice, the defendant can move the court to dismiss the eminent domain proceeding entirely. Notably, the University of California's governing board doesn't count as a public entity for this section, so a defendant facing the Regents follows the ordinary civil-judgment path rather than the government-enforcement one.
Frequently Asked Questions
What can a defendant do if the agency doesn't pay the judgment on time?
Enforce the judgment as the defendant would enforce any judgment against that type of party, or move to dismiss the proceeding after giving the required notice.
What has to happen before a defendant can move to dismiss for nonpayment?
The defendant must file and serve, by registered or certified mail, written notice of the failure to pay, and the agency must then fail to pay in full for 20 more days.
Does the defendant have to try enforcement before seeking dismissal?
No. The defendant may elect to pursue dismissal without first attempting to enforce the judgment.
Does the Regents of the University of California count as a public entity for this section?
No. Subdivision (d) excludes the Regents from the definition of public entity used here.
Amendment History
Amended by Stats. 1980, Ch. 215, Sec. 1.