RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 1263.205.Improvements Pertaining to the Realty Defined; Determining Whether Property Can Be Removed Without Substantial Economic Loss

Title 7. Eminent Domain Law · Chapter 9. Compensation · Article 3. Compensation for Improvements · Enacted 1975 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 1263.205 defines improvements pertaining to the realty as machinery or equipment installed on the taken property or remainder that can't be removed without substantial economic loss or damage regardless of how it was installed, and directs comparing in-place value to removed-and-sold value to test that standard.

Full Text of § 1263.205

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a) As used in this article, "improvements pertaining to the realty" include any machinery or equipment installed for use on property taken by eminent domain, or on the remainder if such property is part of a larger parcel, that cannot be removed without a substantial economic loss or without substantial damage to the property on which it is installed, regardless of the method of installation.
(b) In determining whether particular property can be removed "without a substantial economic loss" within the meaning of this section, the value of the property in place considered as a part of the realty should be compared with its value if it were removed and sold.

Plain-English Summary

Article 3 turns to a category of property that sits at the boundary between real estate and personal property: machinery and equipment bolted, wired, or otherwise fixed to a building or parcel. Section 1263.205 gives this category a name -- improvements pertaining to the realty -- and a definition that decides whether it gets valued as part of the land or left out of the compensation picture entirely.

The test turns on removability. Machinery or equipment installed for use on the property taken (or on the remainder, if the taken property is part of a larger parcel) counts as an improvement pertaining to the realty when it can't be removed without substantial economic loss, or without substantial damage to the property it's attached to. The method of installation -- bolted down, wired in, or something else -- doesn't change that analysis.

Subdivision (b) supplies the yardstick for "substantial economic loss": compare what the item is worth staying in place as part of the real estate against what it would be worth if pulled out and sold separately. A large gap between those two numbers signals that removal would cause the kind of loss this section is built to prevent.

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes machinery or equipment an improvement pertaining to the realty?

Under § 1263.205(a), it must be installed for use on the property taken (or the remainder) and be unable to be removed without substantial economic loss or substantial damage to the property.

Does the way the equipment was attached to the property matter?

No. Section 1263.205(a) applies regardless of the method of installation.

How is substantial economic loss measured?

By comparing the item's value in place as part of the realty against its value if removed and sold, under § 1263.205(b).

Why does this classification matter for compensation?

Because § 1263.210 requires improvements pertaining to the realty to be taken into account in determining compensation, unlike ordinary removable personal property.

Amendment History

Added by Stats. 1975, Ch. 1275.

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from the Deering's California Codes Annotated / vLex. Enacted by the California Legislature. Last verified July 29, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: improvements pertaining to the realty definedfixtures eminent domain californiamachinery and equipment condemnation compensation