§ 1245.340.Information Required In Resolution
Title 7. Eminent Domain Law · Chapter 4. Precondemnation Activities · Article 3. Resolution Consenting to Eminent Domain Proceeding by Quasi-Public Entity · Enacted 1975 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 1245.340
Plain-English Summary
This section is Article 3's counterpart to § 1245.230, spelling out what the consenting resolution has to contain. It needs a general statement of the public use the property is being taken for, with a reference to the statute authorizing the quasi-public entity's acquisition, and a description of the property's general location and extent detailed enough for reasonable identification.
The resolution also has to declare that the legislative body found and determined four things: that the public interest and necessity require the proposed project, that the project is planned or located to be most compatible with the greatest good and the least private injury, that the property described is necessary for the project, and — the addition unique to this article — that the hardship to the quasi-public entity if the acquisition isn't permitted outweighs any hardship to the property owners.
That fourth finding reflects the different posture of a quasi-public entity's condemnation power. Because the entity isn't a general government body exercising eminent domain as a matter of course, the legislative body has to weigh the entity's own need against the burden on the owners before consenting — unless the property involves an appurtenant easement or temporary right of entry, where §§ 1245.325 and 1245.326 substitute different findings entirely.
Frequently Asked Questions
What must a consenting resolution under this article contain?
A statement of the public use and the authorizing statute, a description of the property, and a declaration of four findings: public necessity, compatible planning, that the property is necessary, and that the entity's hardship if denied outweighs the owners' hardship.
How is this different from the public-entity resolution of necessity under § 1245.230?
It adds a fourth finding weighing the quasi-public entity's hardship against the property owners' hardship, a comparison the public-entity resolution doesn't require.
Does this section apply to an owner seeking an appurtenant easement or temporary right of entry?
No. Sections 1245.325 and 1245.326 substitute different findings for those two specific situations, in lieu of the findings in subdivision (c) of this section.
Amendment History
Added by Stats. 1975, Ch. 1275.