§ 1240.620.Burden of Proof
Title 7. Eminent Domain Law · Chapter 3. The Right to Take · Article 7. Condemnation for More Necessary Public Use · Enacted 1975 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 1240.620
Plain-English Summary
The burden-of-proof structure here tracks § 1240.520's compatible-use rule exactly, applied instead to more-necessary-use claims. A defendant objecting to a taking under § 1240.610 has to first prove the property is appropriated to public use.
Once that threshold fact is established, the burden shifts to the plaintiff, who must then prove that its use satisfies § 1240.610's requirement, that the new use is more necessary than the use already on the property. That burden, and the presumptions layered on top of it by §§ 1240.640 through 1240.660, does most of the real work in more-necessary-use disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who proves the property is appropriated to public use in a more-necessary-use case?
The defendant, if the defendant objects to the taking on that basis.
Who then proves the new use is more necessary?
The plaintiff, who must prove its use satisfies § 1240.610's requirement.
Do any presumptions affect this burden of proof?
Yes. Sections 1240.640 through 1240.660 supply presumptions about relative necessity depending on whether the state, another public entity, or a local public entity is the condemnor.
Amendment History
Added by Stats. 1975, Ch. 1275.