§ 1240.410.Acquisition of Remnant
Title 7. Eminent Domain Law · Chapter 3. The Right to Take · Article 5. Excess Condemnation · Enacted 1975 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 1240.410
Plain-English Summary
Splitting a property in two can leave the untaken portion worthless in practical terms: too small, too oddly shaped, or too isolated to sell or use effectively. Section 1240.410 defines that leftover piece as a "remnant," a remainder, or portion of one, left in a size, shape, or condition of little market value, and lets the public entity condemn it too.
Unlike § 1240.150's remainder provision, this section doesn't require the owner's consent. But it does give the owner a defense: property can't be taken as a remnant if the owner proves the public entity has a reasonable, practicable, and economically sound way to avoid creating the remnant in the first place, for instance by redesigning the project's boundary.
This is the clearest example of excess condemnation in this chapter, taking more than the project itself strictly requires, justified by the practical reality that an uneconomic remnant serves neither the public entity's project nor the owner left holding it.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a "remnant" under this section?
A remainder, or portion of one, left in a size, shape, or condition of little market value after a public entity takes part of a larger parcel.
Does the owner have to consent to a remnant being condemned under § 1240.410?
No, unlike § 1240.150's remainder provision, this section doesn't require the owner's consent.
Can an owner stop a remnant from being taken?
Yes, by proving the public entity has a reasonable, practicable, and economically sound way to prevent the property from becoming a remnant in the first place.
Amendment History
Added by Stats. 1975, Ch. 1275.