RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 1240.240.Acquisition of Property By Any Means Consented to By Owner

Title 7. Eminent Domain Law · Chapter 3. The Right to Take · Article 3. Future Use · Enacted 1975 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 1240.240 lets a public entity acquire property for a future use by any means the owner has expressly consented to, including eminent domain, without regard to Article 3's other restrictions on future-use takings.

Full Text of § 1240.240

Text size

Notwithstanding any other provision of this article, any public entity authorized to acquire property for a particular use by eminent domain may acquire property to be used in the future for that use by any means (including eminent domain) expressly consented to by its owner.

Plain-English Summary

Just as § 1240.150 carves out a consent-based path around the remainder-acquisition rules, § 1240.240 does the same for future-use takings. When the owner expressly consents, a public entity can acquire property intended for future use by any means, including eminent domain, without satisfying the seven-year probability requirement or the burden-of-proof rules the rest of Article 3 imposes.

The reasoning follows a pattern this chapter repeats elsewhere: Article 3's seven-year timeline and burden-shifting rules exist to protect an owner from indefinite or speculative condemnation. An owner who has already consented to the acquisition doesn't need that protection, so this section lets the transaction proceed on the owner's own terms instead.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a public entity skip the seven-year rule for a future-use taking?

Yes, if the property owner expressly consents to the acquisition by any means, including eminent domain, under § 1240.240.

Why does consent change the analysis?

Article 3's timing and burden-of-proof rules exist to protect owners from open-ended or speculative takings; an owner's express consent removes the need for that protection.

Does this section require eminent domain specifically?

No. It covers any means of acquisition the owner expressly consents to, of which eminent domain is only one example.

Amendment History

Added by Stats. 1975, Ch. 1275.

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from the Deering's California Codes Annotated / vLex. Enacted by the California Legislature. Last verified July 29, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: consent to future use acquisition california