§ 1167.1.Dismissal For Failure to File Proof of Service
Title 3. Of Summary Proceedings · Chapter 4. Summary Proceedings for Obtaining Possession of Real Property in Certain Cases · Enacted 2016 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 1167.1
Plain-English Summary
Filing an unlawful detainer complaint starts the clock on serving it, too. If sixty days pass after the complaint is filed and no proof of service of the summons has been filed with the court, the court may dismiss the action.
The dismissal is without prejudice, so a plaintiff who loses the case this way isn't barred from refiling and trying again with proper, timely service. This section functions as a backstop that keeps unlawful detainer dockets from accumulating cases where service was never completed or documented.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if a landlord files an unlawful detainer complaint but never files proof the summons was served?
The court may dismiss the action, but only without prejudice, once sixty days have passed since the complaint was filed without proof of service being filed.
Does this dismissal stop the landlord from filing again?
No. Because the dismissal is without prejudice, the landlord may file a new action and properly serve and document service the second time.
Amendment History
Added by Stats 2016 ch 336 (AB 2819),s 4, eff. 1/1/2017.