§ 1141.20.Award Final Unless De Novo Trial Or Dismissal Requested;; De Novo Trial
Title 3. Of Summary Proceedings · Chapter 2.5. Judicial Arbitration · Last amended 2012 · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 1141.20
Plain-English Summary
An arbitration award under this chapter isn't the end of the case automatically, but it becomes final if nobody acts. Subdivision (a) gives any party 60 days after the arbitrator files the award to file a request for a trial de novo, or a request for dismissal in the form the Judicial Council prescribes. Let that window close without filing either, and the award stands as final.
Subdivision (b) is what makes the trial de novo meaningful rather than a formality: any party can elect it, and the resulting trial, by court or jury, reaches both the law and the facts fresh, as if the arbitration had never happened. The statute also protects the case's place in line: the trial de novo is calendared, where possible, to give the case the same spot on the active trial list it held before arbitration, or civil priority on the next setting calendar if that's not possible.
This is the feature that separates judicial arbitration from binding private arbitration — no party is stuck with an arbitrator's decision. § 1141.21's cost-shifting rule is the only real check on a party's freedom to demand the trial de novo, discouraging a demand made only to delay or pressure the other side rather than because the party has reason to think trial will produce a better result.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does a party have to request a trial de novo after an arbitration award?
60 days after the date the arbitrator files the award with the court.
What happens if no one requests a trial de novo within that time?
The arbitration award becomes final.
Does a trial de novo start over completely, or just review the arbitrator's decision?
It starts over completely — Section 1141.20(b) makes it a trial by court or jury on both the law and the facts.
Does electing a trial de novo cost a party its place on the court's trial calendar?
No. The statute directs that the trial be calendared, where possible, to keep the case's original place on the active list, or to receive civil priority on the next setting calendar.
Amendment History
Amended by Stats 2011 ch 49 (SB 731),s 3, eff. 1/1/2012.