Rule 35.Physical and mental examinations
Group V: Depositions and Discovery · Last amended March 1, 2017 · Last verified July 14, 2026
Full Text of Rule 35
Amendment History
Added February 2, 2017, effective March 1, 2017.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 35 comes into play when a party's physical or mental condition -- including something as specific as blood group -- is itself a disputed issue in the case, most often in personal injury litigation where the extent of an injury is contested. The court can order that party to submit to an examination by a suitably licensed or certified examiner, and the same authority extends to ordering an examination of someone in that party's custody or under its legal control, such as a minor child. An order like this does not issue automatically just because a party asks; the moving party has to show good cause, and every party along with the person to be examined has to receive notice before the court can act. Once the court is satisfied that good cause exists, the order has to spell out the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the examination, and identify who will perform it.
The rest of the rule governs the paper trail the examination produces. The party who moved for the exam has to hand over a copy of the examiner's written report to whoever requests it -- either the party who was examined or the party against whom the order was entered -- along with reports from any earlier examinations of the same condition, and the report has to detail the examiner's findings, diagnoses, conclusions, and test results. Once that first exchange happens, the moving party can turn around and request comparable reports covering earlier or later examinations of the same condition from the other side, though those need not be produced if that party shows it could not obtain them. Requesting and receiving the examiner's report, or deposing the examiner, comes with a real cost: doing either one waives any privilege the examined party might otherwise claim over testimony about every examination of that same condition, in that case or any other case involving the same controversy. If a party refuses to hand over a report it owes, the court can order production on just terms, and if the report never surfaces, the court can bar the examiner from testifying at trial. These reporting and waiver rules apply equally to examinations the parties arranged by agreement, unless their agreement says otherwise, and none of it forecloses getting an examiner's report or deposing the examiner through some other discovery rule.
Frequently Asked Questions
When can a court order me to submit to a physical or mental examination?
Only when your physical or mental condition is in controversy in the case, and only on a motion showing good cause, with notice to you and every other party. Rule 35(a) does not allow examinations as a matter of routine discovery.
What has to be in the court order requiring an examination?
Rule 35(a)(2)(B) requires the order to specify the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the examination, and to name the person or persons who will perform it.
Am I entitled to a copy of the examiner's report after an independent medical examination?
Yes. Rule 35(b)(1) lets the examined party, or the party who obtained the order, request a copy of the examiner's report along with reports from any earlier examinations of the same condition, and the party who moved for the exam must provide it.
What happens if I request the examiner's report -- do I give up anything by asking for it?
Yes. Under Rule 35(b)(4), requesting and obtaining the examiner's report, or deposing the examiner, waives any privilege you might have over testimony concerning all examinations of that same condition, whether in this case or any other case involving the same controversy.
What can happen if the party who ordered the examination will not turn over the report?
Rule 35(b)(5) allows the court, on motion, to order the report produced on just terms. If the report still is not provided, the court has authority to exclude the examiner's testimony at trial.