Rule 22.Interpleader
Group IV: Parties · Last amended March 1, 2017 · Last verified July 14, 2026
Full Text of Rule 22
Amendment History
Added February 2, 2017, effective March 1, 2017.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 22 addresses the bind a party faces when more than one person claims the same money or property and paying one claimant risks a second lawsuit from another. Through interpleader, that party can join all the rival claimants as defendants and let the court sort out who holds the winning claim. This works even when the claimants' theories come from different sources, conflict with one another, or when the party bringing the action denies owing anything to anyone.
A defendant already facing a lawsuit can use the same tool, raising interpleader through a crossclaim or counterclaim rather than starting a new case. Rule 22 doesn't replace the general joinder rules in Rule 20 — it adds another option alongside them.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is interpleader and when would someone use it?
Interpleader lets a party facing competing claims to the same money or property force the rival claimants into a single lawsuit, so the court decides who is entitled to it instead of the party risking multiple lawsuits over the same fund.
Do the competing claims have to be identical to use interpleader?
No. Interpleader works even when the claims or the titles behind them come from different sources or conflict with each other.
Can I use interpleader if I do not think I owe anyone anything?
Yes. A party can use interpleader even while denying liability, in whole or in part, to any or all of the claimants.
Can a defendant already in a lawsuit use interpleader?
Yes. A defendant facing similar exposure to double or multiple liability can raise interpleader through a crossclaim or counterclaim.
How does Rule 22 relate to Rule 20's joinder rules?
Rule 22 adds another route for joining claimants — it supplements Rule 20's general joinder rules rather than limiting them.