RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

822.28.Jurisdiction declined by reason of conduct.

Ch. 822: Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act · Last amended 2005 · Last verified July 15, 2026

In one sentenceSection 822.28 makes a Wisconsin court give up jurisdiction it gained only because someone engaged in unjustifiable conduct, unless everyone involved has accepted that jurisdiction, another court says Wisconsin is the more appropriate forum, or no other state would qualify, and it can assess the wrongdoer’s expenses and fashion protective remedies.

Full Text of Section 822.28

Text sizeJump to: (1) (2) (3)

(1) Except as provided in s. 822.24, if a court of this state has jurisdiction under this chapter because a person seeking to invoke its jurisdiction has engaged in unjustifiable conduct, the court shall decline to exercise its jurisdiction unless any of the following occurs:
(a) The parents and all persons acting as parents have acquiesced in the exercise of jurisdiction.
(b) A court of the state otherwise having jurisdiction under ss. 822.21 to 822.23 determines that this state is a more appropriate forum under s. 822.27.
(c) No court of any other state would have jurisdiction under the criteria specified in ss. 822.21 to 822.23.
(2) If a court of this state declines to exercise its jurisdiction under sub. (1), it may fashion an appropriate remedy to ensure the safety of the child and prevent a repetition of the unjustifiable conduct, including staying the proceeding until a child custody proceeding is commenced in a court having jurisdiction under ss. 822.21 to 822.23.
(3) If a court dismisses a petition or stays a proceeding because it declines to exercise its jurisdiction under sub. (1), it shall assess against the party seeking to invoke its jurisdiction necessary and reasonable expenses including costs, communication expenses, attorney fees, investigative fees, expenses for witnesses, travel expenses, and expenses for child care during the course of the proceedings, unless the party from whom fees are sought establishes that the assessment would be clearly inappropriate. The court may not assess fees, costs, or expenses against this state unless authorized by law other than this chapter.

Plain-English Summary

Section 822.28 addresses jurisdiction obtained through wrongdoing, such as concealing or wrongfully removing a child to create a jurisdictional foothold in Wisconsin. Subsection (1) sets the default: if Wisconsin has jurisdiction under chapter 822 because the person invoking it engaged in unjustifiable conduct, the court must decline to exercise that jurisdiction, subject to the emergency-jurisdiction exception in section 822.24. Three exceptions let the court keep the case anyway: the parents and all persons acting as parents have acquiesced in the exercise of jurisdiction; a court in the state that would otherwise have jurisdiction under sections 822.21 through 822.23 determines Wisconsin is the more appropriate forum under section 822.27; or no court of any other state would have jurisdiction under those same criteria.

Subsection (2) gives the court room to protect the child even while declining jurisdiction. It may fashion an appropriate remedy to ensure the child’s safety and prevent a repetition of the unjustifiable conduct, including staying the proceeding until a custody proceeding is commenced in a court that does have jurisdiction under sections 822.21 through 822.23.

Subsection (3) addresses cost-shifting. If the court dismisses a petition or stays a proceeding under this section, it must assess necessary and reasonable expenses, including costs, communication expenses, attorney fees, investigative fees, witness expenses, travel expenses, and child care expenses, against the party who sought to invoke the wrongfully obtained jurisdiction, unless that party shows the assessment would be clearly inappropriate. The court may not assess fees, costs, or expenses against the state of Wisconsin itself unless some other law authorizes it.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if someone gets Wisconsin jurisdiction over a custody case through wrongful conduct, like hiding or taking the child?

Section 822.28(1) requires the court to decline that jurisdiction, subject to the exceptions the section lists and to the emergency-jurisdiction exception in section 822.24.

Are there any exceptions that let Wisconsin keep the case anyway after unjustifiable conduct?

Yes, three: the parents and all persons acting as parents have acquiesced in Wisconsin’s jurisdiction; the court that would otherwise have jurisdiction determines Wisconsin is the more appropriate forum; or no other state would have jurisdiction under sections 822.21 through 822.23.

If Wisconsin declines jurisdiction under this section, does it just dismiss the case with no protections for the child?

No. Section 822.28(2) lets the court fashion an appropriate remedy to protect the child’s safety and prevent a repeat of the unjustifiable conduct, including a stay until a proceeding starts in a court with proper jurisdiction.

Can the court make the wrongdoer pay the other party’s expenses?

Yes. Section 822.28(3) requires the court to assess necessary and reasonable expenses against the party who sought to invoke jurisdiction, unless that party shows the assessment would be clearly inappropriate.

Can the court make the state of Wisconsin itself pay those expenses?

No. Section 822.28(3) says the court may not assess fees, costs, or expenses against the state unless authorized by law other than chapter 822.

Amendment History

History: 2005 a. 130.

Source & verification. Section text and official notes are reproduced verbatim from the Wisconsin Statutes, published by the Wisconsin Legislature (Legislative Reference Bureau). Last verified July 15, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: wisconsin custody jurisdiction unjustifiable conductchild abduction custody jurisdiction wisconsinwis stat 822.28wrongdoer pays expenses custody case wisconsin