822.27.Inconvenient forum.
Ch. 822: Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act · Last amended 2005 · Last verified July 15, 2026
Full Text of Section 822.27
Official Notes
NOTE: The above annotations cite to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, the predecessor statute to the current Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act.
Plain-English Summary
Section 822.27 gives a Wisconsin court a way to decline jurisdiction it otherwise has, when another state is a better fit for the case. Subsection (1) allows the court to decline jurisdiction at any time it determines it is an inconvenient forum and another state is more appropriate, and the issue can be raised by a party’s motion, the court’s own motion, or a request from another court.
Subsection (2) requires the court to weigh a list of factors before deciding whether it is inconvenient, after letting the parties submit information. Those factors include whether domestic violence has occurred and is likely to continue, and which state could best protect the parties and the child; how long the child has lived outside Wisconsin; the distance between the Wisconsin court and the court that would take over; the parties’ relative financial circumstances; any agreement between the parties about which state should take jurisdiction; the location of the evidence needed to resolve the case, including the child’s testimony; how quickly each court could decide the issue and what procedures it would need; and how familiar each court already is with the facts and issues.
Subsection (3) tells the court what to do once it decides another state is the more appropriate forum: stay the Wisconsin proceeding on the condition that a custody proceeding be commenced promptly in the other state, and impose whatever other conditions it considers just and proper. Subsection (4) covers a related but distinct situation: the court may decline jurisdiction over a custody determination that is incidental to a divorce or other proceeding, while still keeping jurisdiction over that other proceeding.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a Wisconsin court that otherwise has jurisdiction still refuse to hear a custody case?
Yes. Section 822.27(1) lets it decline jurisdiction at any time it determines that Wisconsin is an inconvenient forum and another state is more appropriate.
Who can raise the inconvenient forum issue?
Section 822.27(1) allows it to come from a party’s motion, the court’s own motion, or a request from another court.
What factors does the court weigh in deciding whether it’s an inconvenient forum?
Section 822.27(2) lists domestic violence and which state can best protect the parties and child, how long the child has lived outside Wisconsin, the distance between courts, the parties’ financial circumstances, any agreement on forum, the location of evidence including the child’s testimony, how quickly each court can decide the case, and each court’s familiarity with the facts and issues.
If Wisconsin steps aside as an inconvenient forum, does the case just disappear?
No. Section 822.27(3) requires the court to stay the proceedings on the condition that a custody proceeding be promptly commenced in the other designated state, and it may impose other conditions it considers just and proper.
Can a Wisconsin court decline to decide custody while still handling a related divorce case?
Yes. Section 822.27(4) allows the court to decline jurisdiction over a custody determination incidental to a divorce or other proceeding while retaining jurisdiction over that other proceeding.
Amendment History
History: 2005 a. 130.