822.23.Jurisdiction to modify determination.
Ch. 822: Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act · Last amended 2005 · Last verified July 15, 2026
Full Text of Section 822.23
Official Notes
NOTE: The above annotation cites to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, the predecessor statute to the current Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act.
Plain-English Summary
Section 822.23 governs when Wisconsin can change a custody determination another state made, subject to section 822.24’s emergency-jurisdiction exception. The threshold requirement applies before anything else: Wisconsin must have jurisdiction to make an initial determination under section 822.21(1)(a) or (b), the home-state or significant-connection bases.
Even meeting that threshold is not enough on its own. One of two additional triggers must also apply. Under subsection (1), the other state’s court must determine that it no longer has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction under section 822.22, or that a Wisconsin court would be a more convenient forum under section 822.27. Under subsection (2), either a Wisconsin court or the other state’s court must determine that the child, the child’s parents, and everyone acting as a parent no longer presently reside in the other state.
Together, sections 822.22 and 822.23 form two halves of the same rule: section 822.22 tells a Wisconsin court when it keeps or loses continuing jurisdiction over its own determination, and section 822.23 tells a Wisconsin court when it may step in to modify a determination the other state made. Wisconsin cannot take over modification only because it would now qualify for initial jurisdiction; the issuing state’s grip has to have loosened first.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a Wisconsin court change a custody order that another state issued?
Only under the conditions section 822.23 sets: Wisconsin must qualify for initial jurisdiction under section 822.21(1)(a) or (b), and either the other state’s court must have given up or lost its exclusive, continuing jurisdiction, or nobody connected to the case may still live in that other state.
What must Wisconsin have before it can modify another state’s custody order?
Jurisdiction to make an initial determination under section 822.21(1)(a) or (b), meaning home-state jurisdiction or the significant-connection basis.
Does the other state have to agree it no longer controls the case?
One available path requires the other state’s court to determine that it no longer has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction under section 822.22, or that Wisconsin would be a more convenient forum under section 822.27.
Is there a way to modify the order without the other state weighing in?
Yes. Section 822.23(2) allows either a Wisconsin court or the other state’s court to determine that the child, the child’s parents, and all persons acting as parents no longer presently reside in the other state, which satisfies the alternative trigger.
What happens if the other state’s court still has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction and nobody has moved?
Then Wisconsin may not modify the determination, since neither of the triggers in section 822.23(1) or (2) would be satisfied.
Amendment History
History: 2005 a. 130.