RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

807.04.Proceedings, where held; restriction as to making orders.

Ch. 807: Miscellaneous Provisions · Last amended 2001 · Last verified July 15, 2026

In one sentenceSection 807.04 requires trials and hearings with oral testimony to be held in open court, except that a prisoner’s action or special proceeding must use telephone, video, or similar live communication so the prisoner need not leave the facility, with counsel and witnesses included the same way when feasible.

Full Text of Section 807.04

Text sizeJump to: (1) (2)

(1) Except as provided under sub. (2), all trials, and all hearings at which oral testimony is to be presented, shall be held in open court. The court may make any order which a judge or a circuit or supplemental court commissioner has power to make.
(2) All hearings in which oral testimony is to be presented in an action or special proceeding that is commenced by a prisoner, as defined in s. 801.02 (7) (a) 2., shall be conducted by telephone, interactive video and audio transmission or other live interactive communication without removing him or her from the facility or institution if his or her participation is required or permitted and if the official having custody of him or her agrees. The court in which the action or special proceeding is commenced shall, when feasible, also allow counsel, witnesses and other necessary persons to participate in the hearing by telephone, interactive video and audio transmission or other live interactive communication. The procedures and policies under s. 807.13 shall apply to the extent feasible.

Plain-English Summary

Section 807.04 sets a default and an exception for where civil proceedings happen. Subsection (1) requires that, except as provided in subsection (2), all trials and all hearings at which oral testimony is presented be held in open court, and it gives the court authority to make any order that a judge or a circuit or supplemental court commissioner has power to make.

Subsection (2) departs from that default for prisoner cases. All hearings involving oral testimony in an action or special proceeding commenced by a prisoner, as defined in Section 801.02 (7)(a)2., must be conducted by telephone, interactive video and audio transmission, or other live interactive communication, so the prisoner need not be removed from the facility or institution, so long as the prisoner’s participation is required or permitted and the official having custody agrees. The court in which the case is pending must, when feasible, also let counsel, witnesses, and other necessary persons participate the same way, and the procedures and policies under Section 807.13 apply to the extent feasible.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do trials and hearings involving live testimony have to happen in open court?

Yes, as the general rule. Subsection (1) requires all trials and hearings at which oral testimony is presented to be held in open court, except as provided in subsection (2).

What power does the court have when making orders in these proceedings?

Subsection (1) lets the court make any order that a judge or a circuit or supplemental court commissioner has power to make.

How are hearings handled when the case is a special proceeding brought by a prisoner?

Subsection (2) requires such hearings to be conducted by telephone, interactive video and audio transmission, or other live interactive communication, without removing the prisoner from the facility, if the prisoner’s participation is required or permitted and the official having custody agrees.

Can counsel and witnesses also participate remotely in a prisoner’s hearing?

Yes, when feasible. Subsection (2) requires the court to allow counsel, witnesses, and other necessary persons to participate by telephone, interactive video and audio transmission, or other live interactive communication when feasible.

What procedures govern these telephone or video hearings in prisoner cases?

Subsection (2) states that the procedures and policies under Section 807.13 apply to the extent feasible.

Amendment History

History: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 743 (1975); 1977 c. 187 s. 135; 1997 a. 133; 2001 a. 61.

Source & verification. Section text and official notes are reproduced verbatim from the Wisconsin Statutes, published by the Wisconsin Legislature (Legislative Reference Bureau). Last verified July 15, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: wisconsin prisoner hearing by telephoneopen court hearing requirement wisconsinvideo hearing prisoner lawsuit wisconsin