Rule 2:1003.USE OF SUBSTITUTE CHECKS (derived from Code § 8.01-391.1(A) and
Part Two: Virginia Rules of Evidence · Last amended 2021 · Last verified July 16, 2026
Full Text of Rule 2:1003
Plain-English Summary
Rule 2:1003 addresses a specific gap the best-evidence rule created once banks stopped routinely returning original paper checks to account holders. Subdivision (a) makes a substitute check — created under the federal Check Clearing for the 21st Century Evidence Act, 12 U.S.C. § 5001 et seq. — admissible in any Virginia legal proceeding, civil or criminal, to the same extent the original check would be. Without this rule, a party might otherwise need to satisfy Rule 2:1002’s original-writing requirement or one of Rule 2:1004’s exceptions before offering a substitute check into evidence.
Subdivision (b) simplifies the foundation further with a presumption. A document received from a banking institution that is designated as a “substitute check” and that bears the legend “This is a legal copy of your check. You can use it the same way you would use the original check” is presumed to be a substitute check created under the federal Act. That presumption spares the proponent from independently proving the document meets every technical requirement of the federal statute before relying on it.
The rule’s title notes it derives from Code § 8.01-391.1(A) and (B), tying Rule 2:1003 to a specific Virginia statutory provision that addresses the same subject as the federal check-clearing law.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a substitute check be used in place of the original check in a Virginia case?
Yes. Rule 2:1003(a) makes a substitute check created under the federal Check Clearing for the 21st Century Evidence Act admissible to the same extent as the original check.
What legend on a check document triggers the presumption under Rule 2:1003?
The legend “This is a legal copy of your check. You can use it the same way you would use the original check,” combined with the document being designated as a substitute check by a banking institution.
What does the presumption under Rule 2:1003(b) establish?
That the document is presumed to be a substitute check created pursuant to the federal Check Clearing for the 21st Century Evidence Act, without the proponent needing to independently prove that fact.
Does Rule 2:1003 apply in both civil and criminal proceedings?
Yes. Subdivision (a) states the substitute check is admissible in any Virginia legal proceeding, civil or criminal.
What federal law underlies Rule 2:1003?
The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Evidence Act, codified at 12 U.S.C. § 5001 et seq.
Amendment History
Adopted and promulgated by Order dated June 1, 2012; effective July 1, 2012. Last amended by Order dated November 13, 2020; effective July 1, 2021.