RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 2:1002.REQUIREMENT OF PRODUCTION OF ORIGINAL

Part Two: Virginia Rules of Evidence · Last amended 2012 · Last verified July 16, 2026

In one sentenceRule 2:1002 states Virginia’s best-evidence rule — proving the content of a writing generally requires producing the original — subject to the exceptions found elsewhere in the Rules of Evidence, other Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a Virginia statute.

Full Text of Rule 2:1002

Text size

To prove the content of a writing, the original writing is required, except as otherwise
provided in these Rules, other Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or in a Virginia statute.

Plain-English Summary

Rule 2:1002 is the core requirement behind the best-evidence article: to prove the content of a writing, a party must produce the original. That requirement targets proof of what a writing says — its content — not every situation where a writing happens to be relevant. If a witness testifies to an event she observed and mentions that she later wrote it down, the rule does not force production of that note, because the content of the writing itself is not what proves the fact.

The rule’s force comes with a broad qualifier: the original is required except as otherwise provided in these Rules, other Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a Virginia statute. That qualifier does most of the practical work, because the exceptions found in Rule 2:1004 (originals lost, unobtainable, or held by an opponent, or the writing being collateral) and Rule 2:1005 (various categories of admissible copies) apply often enough that the original-production requirement operates more as a default than an absolute rule.

Rule 2:1002 traces back to a historical concern about the accuracy of handwritten copies before mechanical and electronic reproduction became reliable and common. Modern practice under Rules 2:1004 and 2:1005 reflects that shift, admitting copies far more often than the strict letter of Rule 2:1002 alone might suggest.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I always need the original document to prove what it says in a Virginia proceeding?

As a general rule, yes — Rule 2:1002 requires the original to prove the content of a writing — but the rule is subject to exceptions found in these Rules, other Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, and Virginia statutes.

Does Rule 2:1002 apply to every situation where a writing is mentioned in testimony?

No. It applies specifically to proving the content of a writing; testimony about an event that happens to have been written down elsewhere does not necessarily trigger the original-production requirement.

What are the main sources of exceptions to the original-writing requirement?

Rule 2:1004 lists situations excusing production of the original, and Rule 2:1005 allows various categories of copies to be used in its place.

Why does the best-evidence rule require the original in the first place?

The requirement traces to historical concerns about the accuracy of handwritten copies, a concern modern reproduction methods have significantly reduced.

Can a Virginia statute create an exception to Rule 2:1002’s original-production requirement?

Yes. Rule 2:1002 expressly allows exceptions provided by Virginia statute, in addition to those found in these Rules and other Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia.

Amendment History

Adopted and promulgated by Order dated June 1, 2012; effective July 1, 2012.

Source & verification. Rule text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Rules of Supreme Court of Virginia, published by the Supreme Court of Virginia. Last verified July 16, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: best evidence rule virginiaoriginal document requirement virginia courtrule 2:1002 virginia evidenceproving content of a writing virginiawhen is a copy admissible instead of original virginia