RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 8.01-277.Defective process; motion to quash; untimely service; motion to dismiss.

Chapter 7. Civil Actions; Commencement, Pleadings, and Motions · Article 2. Pleadings Generally · Last amended 2006 · Last verified July 16, 2026

In one sentenceSection 8.01-277 lets a served defendant raise a defect in process, service, or return by a motion to quash filed before or with a merits pleading, and lets a defendant not served within a year make a special appearance to seek dismissal with prejudice unless the plaintiff shows due diligence.

Full Text of § 8.01-277

Text sizeJump to: (A) (B)

A. A person, upon whom process to answer any action has been served, may take advantage of any defect in the issuance, service or return thereof by a motion to quash filed prior to or simultaneously with the filing of any pleading to the merits. Upon sustaining the motion, the court may strike the proof of service or permit amendment of the process or its return as may seem just.
B. A person, upon whom process has not been served within one year of commencement of the action against him, may make a special appearance, which does not constitute a general appearance, to file a motion to dismiss. Upon finding that the plaintiff did not exercise due diligence to have timely service and sustaining the motion to dismiss, the court shall dismiss the action with prejudice. Upon finding that the plaintiff did exercise due diligence to have timely service and denying the motion to dismiss, the court shall require the person filing such motion to file a responsive pleading within 21 days of such ruling. Nothing herein shall prevent the plaintiff from filing a nonsuit under § 8.01-380 before the entry of an order granting a motion to dismiss pursuant to the provisions of this section. Nothing in this subsection shall pertain to cases involving asbestos.

Plain-English Summary

Subsection A gives a defendant a specific, early tool for attacking bad process: a motion to quash, aimed at any defect in the issuance, service, or return of process. It has to be filed before, or at the same time as, any pleading to the merits, raise it too late, alongside a substantive defense, and the objection is gone. If the court sustains the motion, it can strike the proof of service or allow the process or its return to be amended, whichever seems just.

Subsection B addresses the more serious problem of a defendant who was never served at all within a year of the case being filed. That defendant can make a special appearance, one that does not count as a general appearance, to move for dismissal. If the court finds the plaintiff did not exercise due diligence to achieve timely service, as § 8.01-275.1 defines that standard, it sustains the motion and dismisses the action with prejudice. If the plaintiff did exercise due diligence, the court denies the motion and gives the moving defendant 21 days to file a responsive pleading. Nothing in the section stops the plaintiff from taking a nonsuit under § 8.01-380 before the entry of an order granting the motion to dismiss, and the subsection does not apply to asbestos cases.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does a defendant challenge a defect in how process was issued or served in Virginia?

By a motion to quash, filed prior to or simultaneously with any pleading to the merits.

What can the court do if it sustains a motion to quash?

Strike the proof of service or permit amendment of the process or its return, as may seem just.

What can a defendant do if not served within a year of the action being commenced?

Make a special appearance, which does not constitute a general appearance, to file a motion to dismiss.

What happens if the court finds the plaintiff did not exercise due diligence to timely serve the defendant?

The court sustains the motion to dismiss and dismisses the action with prejudice.

Can a plaintiff still take a nonsuit while a motion to dismiss for untimely service is pending?

Yes. Nothing in the section prevents the plaintiff from filing a nonsuit under § 8.01-380 before the court enters an order granting the motion to dismiss.

Amendment History

Code 1950, § 8-118; 1954, c. 333; 1977, c. 617; 1994, c. 37; 2006, c. 151.

Source & verification. Section text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Code of Virginia, published by the Code of Virginia, Virginia Division of Legislative Automated Systems. Last verified July 16, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: virginia motion to quash service of process8.01-277 explainedvirginia motion to dismiss untimely servicespecial appearance virginia lawsuitdue diligence service of process dismissal virginiaMTD virginia