§ 8.01-276.Demurrer to evidence and plea in abatement abolished; motion to strike evidence and written motion, respectively, to be used in lieu thereof.
Chapter 7. Civil Actions; Commencement, Pleadings, and Motions · Article 2. Pleadings Generally · Last amended 1977 · Last verified July 16, 2026
Full Text of § 8.01-276
Plain-English Summary
Section 8.01-276 retires two more pieces of old common-law and equity terminology, replacing each with a plainer procedural tool. The demurrer to the evidence, a device for testing whether the evidence presented at trial legally supports a verdict, is abolished; anything it used to reach is now handled through a motion to strike the evidence.
The plea in abatement, the traditional vehicle for defenses like improper venue, misjoinder, or lack of capacity to sue, is likewise abolished. In its place, any defense formerly raised by plea in abatement can be made by a written motion that specifically states the relief demanded and the grounds for it. That motion generally has to be made within the time the Rules of the Supreme Court prescribe, except when the ground is the court’s lack of jurisdiction over an indispensable party or over the subject matter, which are not subject to that same deadline.
When the motion challenges venue specifically, the statute adds a requirement with teeth: the movant must state why venue is improperly laid and identify what place or places within Virginia would be the proper venue for the action, rather than merely asserting that the chosen forum is wrong.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are demurrers to the evidence still used in Virginia trials?
No. Section 8.01-276 abolishes the demurrer to the evidence; a motion to strike the evidence is used instead.
What replaced the plea in abatement in Virginia practice?
A written motion stating specifically the relief demanded and the grounds for it, for any defense formerly made by plea in abatement.
Is there a deadline for filing a written motion that replaces a plea in abatement?
Generally yes, within the time prescribed by the Rules of the Supreme Court, except when the ground is lack of the court’s jurisdiction over an indispensable party or over the subject matter.
What must a written motion challenging venue state under this section?
Why venue is improperly laid and what place or places within the Commonwealth would constitute proper venue for the action.
Does this section create a new pleading challenge to venue, separate from § 8.01-264?
It supplies the vehicle, a written motion in lieu of the old plea in abatement, through which a venue challenge is made, working alongside § 8.01-264’s venue-objection procedure.
Amendment History
1977, c. 617.