§ 8.01-216.9.Procedure; statute of limitations.
Chapter 3. Actions · Article 19.1. Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act · Last amended 2011 · Last verified July 16, 2026
Full Text of § 8.01-216.9
Plain-English Summary
Section 8.01-216.9 gathers several procedural rules that apply across actions under the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act. A subpoena requiring a witness to attend a trial or hearing held under the article may be served anywhere in the Commonwealth, without the county or city limits that can otherwise constrain service. The limitations period for a civil action under § 8.01-216.4 or § 8.01-216.5 runs six years from the date of the violation, or three years from when the responsible Commonwealth official knew or reasonably should have known the material facts, whichever comes later — but never more than ten years after the violation itself.
When the Commonwealth intervenes in an action a private plaintiff filed under § 8.01-216.5, it may file its own complaint or amend the plaintiff’s complaint to clarify existing claims or add new ones the Commonwealth believes it is entitled to pursue. A Commonwealth complaint filed this way relates back to the date the private plaintiff originally filed, so long as the Commonwealth’s claim arises from the same conduct, transactions, or occurrences already set out or attempted to be set out in that original complaint.
In any action under § 8.01-216.4 or § 8.01-216.5, the Commonwealth must prove every essential element of the claim, including damages, by a preponderance of the evidence. And where a criminal proceeding charging fraud or false statements ends in a final judgment favoring the Commonwealth — whether by verdict, guilty plea, or plea of nolo contendere — that judgment estops the defendant from denying the essential elements of the offense in a later civil action under § 8.01-216.4 or § 8.01-216.5 involving the same transaction.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does the Commonwealth or a private plaintiff have to file a false claims action?
Six years from the date of the violation, or three years from when the responsible Commonwealth official knew or reasonably should have known the relevant facts, whichever is later — but never more than ten years after the violation occurred.
Can the Commonwealth add new claims after intervening in a plaintiff’s qui tam suit?
Yes. The Commonwealth may file its own complaint or amend the plaintiff’s complaint to clarify or add claims, and the new complaint relates back to the plaintiff’s original filing date so long as it arises from the same conduct or transactions.
What is the Commonwealth’s burden of proof in a false claims action?
A preponderance of the evidence for every essential element, including damages, in any action brought under § 8.01-216.4 or § 8.01-216.5.
Does a criminal fraud conviction help a later civil false claims case?
Yes. A final judgment favoring the Commonwealth in a related criminal fraud or false-statement proceeding — including a guilty plea or a plea of nolo contendere — estops the defendant from denying the elements of that offense in a later civil action over the same transaction.
Where can a trial subpoena in one of these cases be served?
Anywhere in the Commonwealth of Virginia, without the ordinary geographic limits that can otherwise restrict service of a subpoena.
Amendment History
2002, c. 842; 2007, c. 569; 2011, c. 676.