§ 8.01-216.8.Certain actions barred; relief from employment discrimination; waiver of sovereign immunity.
Chapter 3. Actions · Article 19.1. Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act · Last amended 2014 · Last verified July 16, 2026
In one sentenceSection 8.01-216.8 bars qui tam suits by incarcerated persons and suits against government bodies or officials based on facts the Commonwealth already knew, requires dismissal of actions built on publicly disclosed information unless the plaintiff is an original source, and creates a retaliation remedy against employers, including a waiver of the Commonwealth’s sovereign immunity.
Full Text of § 8.01-216.8
Text size
No court shall have jurisdiction over any action brought under this article by an inmate incarcerated within a state or local correctional facility as defined in § 53.1-1.
No court shall have jurisdiction over an action brought under this article against any department, authority, board, bureau, commission, or agency of the Commonwealth, any political subdivision of the Commonwealth, a member of the General Assembly, a member of the judiciary, or an exempt official if the action is based on evidence or information known to the Commonwealth when the action was brought. For purposes of this section, "exempt official" means the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General and the directors or members of any department, authority, board, bureau, commission or agency of the Commonwealth or any political subdivision of the Commonwealth.
In no event may a person bring an action under this article that is based upon allegations or transactions that are the subject of a civil suit or an administrative proceeding in which the Commonwealth is already a party.
The court shall dismiss an action or claim under § 8.01-216.5 unless opposed by the Commonwealth if substantially the same allegations or transactions as alleged in the action or claim were publicly disclosed in a criminal, civil or administrative hearing in which the Commonwealth or its agent is a party, in a Virginia legislative, administrative, or Auditor of Public Accounts' report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the news media, unless the action is brought by the Attorney General or the person bringing the action is an original source of the information. For purposes of this section, "original source" means an individual (i) who either prior to a public disclosure has voluntarily disclosed to the Commonwealth the information on which the allegations or transactions in a claim are based or (ii) who has knowledge that is independent of and materially adds to the publicly disclosed allegations or transactions and who has voluntarily provided the information to the Commonwealth before filing an action under this article.
Except as otherwise provided in this section, the Commonwealth shall not be liable for expenses a person incurs in bringing an action under this article.
Any employee, contractor, or agent shall be entitled to all relief necessary to make that employee, contractor, or agent whole, if that employee, contractor, or agent is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of employment because of lawful acts done by the employee, contractor, agent, or associated others in furtherance of an action under this article or other efforts to stop one or more violations of this article. Relief shall include reinstatement with the same seniority status that employee, contractor, or agent would have had but for the discrimination, two times the amount of back pay, interest on the back pay, and compensation for any special damages sustained as a result of the discrimination, including litigation costs and reasonable attorney fees. Any relief awarded to an employee under this section shall be reduced by any amount awarded to the employee through a state or local grievance process. An action under this section may be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction for the relief provided in this section, but may not be brought more than three years after the date the discrimination occurred. This paragraph shall constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity and creates a cause of action by an employee against the Commonwealth if the Commonwealth is the employer responsible for the adverse employment action that would entitle the employee to the relief set forth in this paragraph.
Plain-English Summary
Section 8.01-216.8 fences off several categories of qui tam suits. No court has jurisdiction over an action brought under the article by a person incarcerated in a state or local correctional facility. No court has jurisdiction over an action against a Commonwealth agency or political subdivision, a General Assembly member, a member of the judiciary, or an “exempt official” — a term covering the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, and the directors or members of state or local agencies — if the suit rests on evidence or information the Commonwealth already had when it was filed. A person also cannot bring an action based on allegations already the subject of a pending civil suit or administrative proceeding in which the Commonwealth is a party.
A separate public-disclosure bar requires the court to dismiss an action under § 8.01-216.5, unless the Commonwealth opposes dismissal, when substantially the same allegations were already publicly disclosed through a hearing involving the Commonwealth, a state legislative, administrative, or Auditor of Public Accounts report or investigation, or the news media. That bar does not apply if the Attorney General brings the action, or if the plaintiff qualifies as an “original source” — someone who voluntarily gave the Commonwealth the underlying information before the public disclosure, or whose independent knowledge materially adds to what was disclosed and who voluntarily shared that knowledge with the Commonwealth before suing. Apart from what the article otherwise allows, the Commonwealth is not liable for a plaintiff’s expenses in bringing the action.
The section closes with a retaliation remedy for employees, contractors, and agents who suffer discharge, demotion, suspension, threats, harassment, or other discrimination in their employment because of lawful acts taken to further an action under the article or to stop a violation of it. Relief includes reinstatement with the seniority the person would otherwise have had, twice the back pay owed, interest on that back pay, and compensation for special damages including litigation costs and reasonable attorney fees, reduced by anything already awarded through a state or local grievance process. The suit must be filed within three years of the discriminatory act, and this paragraph waives the Commonwealth’s sovereign immunity, creating a cause of action against the Commonwealth when it is the employer responsible for the retaliation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an incarcerated person bring a qui tam action under the Act?
No. Section 8.01-216.8 provides that no court has jurisdiction over an action brought under the article by a person incarcerated in a state or local correctional facility.
Can someone sue a state agency or a top government official under the Act?
Generally not if the suit is based on evidence or information the Commonwealth already had when it was filed. The bar covers Commonwealth agencies and political subdivisions, General Assembly members, judges, and “exempt officials” such as the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, and Attorney General.
What is the public-disclosure bar, and how does a plaintiff get around it?
A court must dismiss an action, unless the Commonwealth opposes dismissal, when the allegations were already publicly disclosed through a hearing, a government report or investigation, or the news media. The bar does not apply if the Attorney General brings the suit or the plaintiff is an “original source” who voluntarily gave the Commonwealth the information before or independent of that disclosure.
Does the Act protect employees from retaliation for whistleblowing?
Yes. An employee, contractor, or agent discriminated against for lawful acts furthering an action under the article can recover reinstatement, twice the back pay owed with interest, and special damages including litigation costs and attorney fees, within three years of the retaliatory act.
Can an employee sue the Commonwealth itself for retaliating against a whistleblower?
Yes. The retaliation paragraph expressly waives the Commonwealth’s sovereign immunity and creates a cause of action against the Commonwealth when it is the employer responsible for the discriminatory action.
Amendment History
2002, c. 842; 2011, cc. 651, 676; 2012, c. 479; 2014, c. 403.
Source & verification. Section text and amendment history are
reproduced verbatim from the Code of Virginia, published by the
Code of Virginia, Virginia Division of Legislative Automated Systems. Last verified July 16, 2026.
· Official source
Also known as:virginia whistleblower retaliation protection false claims actvirginia qui tam public disclosure baroriginal source exception virginia false claims actcan an inmate file a qui tam lawsuit in virginiasovereign immunity waiver whistleblower retaliation virginia