RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 8.01-653.1.Mandamus to secure construction of act granting power to incur certain obligations for transportation needs.

Chapter 25. Extraordinary Writs · Article 2. Mandamus and Prohibition · Last amended 1986 · Last verified July 16, 2026

In one sentenceSection 8.01-653.1 requires the Attorney General to file a mandamus petition in the Supreme Court directing the Comptroller to make transportation-obligation payments whenever the Comptroller doubts the constitutionality of an act granting a Commonwealth agency or board general power to incur such obligations, even before the General Assembly authorizes specific obligations under that power.

Full Text of § 8.01-653.1

Text size

Whenever the Comptroller notifies the Attorney General in writing that he entertains doubt respecting the constitutionality of any act of the General Assembly granting an agency of the Commonwealth or other governmental board or entity of the Commonwealth general powers to incur obligations for transportation needs where such obligations are subject to authorization by the General Assembly, the Attorney General shall file in the Supreme Court a petition for a writ of mandamus directing or requiring the Comptroller to pay the money as provided by any such act at such time in the future as may be proper. In order to expedite long-term planning by such an agency of the Commonwealth or other governmental board or entity of the Commonwealth and expedite its advice to the Governor and the General Assembly on possible alternative means of financing Virginia's transportation needs, the petition may be filed after the enactment date of any such act, although (i) the General Assembly may not have enacted legislation specifically authorizing such an agency of the Commonwealth or other governmental board or entity of the Commonwealth to enter into specific obligations under its general authority or (ii) if such specific obligations have been authorized, the time for making payments has not arrived and no demand for payment has been made. The court shall consider and determine all questions raised by the Attorney General's petition pertaining to the constitutionality or interpretation of any such act, even though some of the questions may not be necessary to the decision regarding the duty of the Comptroller to make payment of the moneys appropriated or directed to be paid.
The Comptroller shall be made a party defendant to the petition. The court may, in its discretion, cause other officers or persons to be made parties defendant as it may deem proper, and may make such order respecting the employment of an attorney or attorneys for any officer of the Commonwealth who is a party defendant as may be appropriate. The compensation of any attorney so employed shall be fixed by the court and upon its order paid out of the appropriation to the office or department of the public officer represented by the attorney in the proceeding.

Plain-English Summary

This section runs parallel to § 8.01-653 but is aimed specifically at transportation financing. When the Comptroller notifies the Attorney General in writing of doubt about the constitutionality of an act granting a Commonwealth agency or other governmental board or entity general power to incur obligations for transportation needs subject to General Assembly authorization, the Attorney General must file a petition for a writ of mandamus in the Supreme Court, directing the Comptroller to pay as the act provides at the proper future time. Unlike § 8.01-653, which lets the Attorney General choose whether to file, this section makes filing mandatory.

The timing rule reaches further than the general appropriations version: the petition can be filed after the act’s enactment even though the General Assembly has not yet enacted legislation specifically authorizing the agency to enter particular obligations under its general power, or, if it has, even before the time for payment has arrived and before any demand has been made. The statute states its own purpose for allowing this early filing — to expedite long-term planning by the agency and its advice to the Governor and the General Assembly about alternative ways to finance Virginia’s transportation needs. As in § 8.01-653, the Supreme Court has to resolve every constitutional and interpretive question the petition raises, even those not strictly necessary to decide the Comptroller’s payment duty.

The Comptroller is made a party defendant, the court may add other officers or persons as it deems proper, and any attorney employed to represent a defendant officer has compensation fixed by the court and paid from the appropriation to that officer’s own office or department.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who triggers this section’s mandamus mechanism?

The Comptroller, by notifying the Attorney General in writing of doubt about the constitutionality of an act granting an agency or governmental board or entity general power to incur transportation-related obligations.

Is the Attorney General’s filing discretionary or mandatory?

Mandatory — the Attorney General shall file the petition, unlike the discretionary “may file” language in the parallel § 8.01-653.

Can the petition be filed before the General Assembly authorizes specific obligations under the general grant of power?

Yes — even though the General Assembly may not have enacted legislation specifically authorizing the entity to enter specific obligations under its general authority.

What purpose does the statute give for allowing such early filing?

To expedite long-term planning by the agency and its advice to the Governor and General Assembly on possible alternative means of financing Virginia’s transportation needs.

Who is named as defendant, and how is defense counsel paid?

The Comptroller is made a party defendant, the court may add other officers or persons, and the court fixes and orders payment of any attorney’s compensation from the appropriation to that officer’s office or department.

Amendment History

1986, Sp. Sess., cc. 14, 16.

Source & verification. Section text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Code of Virginia, published by the Code of Virginia, Virginia Division of Legislative Automated Systems. Last verified July 16, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: virginia transportation bond mandamus comptrollervirginia mandamus transportation obligations constitutionality8.01-653.1 explainedvirginia comptroller transportation financing mandamus petitionvirginia general assembly transportation obligations writ of mandamus