§ 8.01-566.Who may make defense to attachment.
Chapter 20. Attachments and Bail in Civil Cases · Article 3. Subsequent Proceedings Generally · Last amended 1977 · Last verified July 16, 2026
Full Text of § 8.01-566
Plain-English Summary
Attachment proceedings can pull in more people than the debtor named on the writ — bond sureties, officers exposed to liability, third parties with claims to the seized property. This section makes clear who among them has standing to fight back. It covers any defendant in the attachment, anyone who is a party to a forthcoming bond given in the case, an officer who could be on the hook to the plaintiff because a bond was ruled bad, and any person entitled under § 8.01-573 to file a petition claiming an interest in the property.
But standing to defend is not the same as an automatic win. Filing a defense does not itself discharge the attachment or release the property that was levied on — the attachment stays in place, and the seized property stays seized, until the court rules on the merits of that defense.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who besides the principal defendant may defend against an attachment?
Any of the defendants, any party to a forthcoming bond given in the case, the officer who may be liable to the plaintiff because a bond was adjudged bad, or any person authorized by § 8.01-573 to file a petition.
Does filing a defense automatically discharge the attachment?
No. The section specifically states the attachment is not thereby discharged and the property levied on is not released.
Can an officer defend the attachment?
Yes, if the officer may be liable to the plaintiff because a bond was adjudged bad.
Can someone who claims an interest in the attached property defend the case?
Yes, if authorized under § 8.01-573 to file a petition asserting that interest.
What is the effect of this section on the property while a defense is pending?
The property remains under the attachment and is not released merely because a defense has been raised.
Amendment History
Code 1950, § 8-554; 1973, c. 545; 1977, c. 617.