RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 51.Instructions to the jury; objections; preserving a claim of error

Group VI: Trials · Last amended March 1, 2019 · Last verified July 14, 2026

In one sentenceRule 51 governs how parties request, and the court settles, jury instructions, requires a clear on-the-record objection to preserve an instruction error, and still allows plain-error review for mistakes that were never preserved at all.

Full Text of Rule 51

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)

(a) Requests.
(1) Before or at the Close of the Evidence. At the close of the evidence or at any earlier reasonable time that the court orders, a party may file and furnish to every other party written requests for the jury instructions it wants the court to give.
(2) After the Close of the Evidence. After the close of the evidence, a party may:
(A) file requests for instructions on issues that could not reasonably have been anticipated by an earlier time that the court set for requests; and
(B) with the court’s permission, file untimely requests for instructions on any issue.
(3) Format; Citation. The written requests must be in the format directed by the court. If a party relies on any statute, rule, caselaw, or other legal authority to support a requested instruction, the party must cite or provide a copy of the authority.
(b) Settling Instructions.
(1) The court must inform the parties of its proposed instructions and proposed action on the requests before instructing the jury.
(2) The court must give the parties an opportunity to object on the record and out of the jury’s hearing before the instructions and arguments are delivered.
(3) The court and the parties must make a record of the instructions that were proposed, that the court rejected or modified, and that the court gave to the jury. If the court modifies an instruction, the court must clearly indicate how the instruction was modified.
(c) Objections.
(1) How to Make. A party who objects to an instruction or the failure to give an instruction must do so on the record, stating distinctly the matter objected to and the grounds for the objection. If a party relies on any statute, rule, caselaw, or other legal authority to object to a requested instruction, the party must cite or provide a copy of the authority.
(2) When to Make. An objection is timely if:
(A) a party objects at the opportunity provided under Rule 51(b)(2); or
(B) a party was not informed of an instruction or action on a request before that opportunity to object, and the party objects promptly after learning that the instruction or request will be, or has been, given or refused.
(d) Giving Instructions.
(1) The court must instruct the jury before the parties’ closing arguments.
(2) The court may also give the jury further instructions that may become necessary by reason of the parties’ closing arguments.
(3) The final instructions given to the jury must be bound together in the order given and the court must sign the last instruction. The court must provide the original instructions or a copy of them to the jury.
(4) After the jury has reached a verdict and been discharged, the originals and copies of all given instructions must be made part of the trial court record.
(e) Assigning Error; Plain Error.
(1) Assigning Error. A party may assign as error:
(A) an error in an instruction actually given, if that party properly objected; or
(B) a failure to give an instruction, if that party properly requested it and—unless the court rejected the request in a definitive ruling on the record—also properly objected.
(2) Plain Error. A court may consider a plain error in the instructions that has not been preserved as required by Rule 51(e)(1) if the error affects substantial rights.
(f) Scope.
(1) Preliminary Instructions. Nothing in this rule prevents a party from requesting, or the court from giving, preliminary instructions to the jury. A request for preliminary instructions must be made at any reasonable time that the court orders. If preliminary instructions are requested or given, the court and the parties must comply with Rules 51(a)(3), 51(b), and 51(d)(4), as applicable.
(2) Other Instructions. This rule governs instructions to the jury on the law that governs the verdict. Other instructions, including instructions to a venire and cautionary or limiting instructions delivered in immediate response to events at trial, are outside the scope of this rule.

Notes

Advisory Committee Note — 2019 Amendment: Subsection (a). The amendments reorganize Rule 51, preserving portions of former NRCP 51 and incorporating provisions from FRCP 51. NRS Chapter 16 also addresses jury instructions. Subsection (b). Rule 51(b)(3) restates former NRCP 51(b)(2) as to modifying or refusing to give proposed instructions. Specific words and actions are not necessary, but the court and the parties should make a record of all instructions that the court or the parties propose, that the court modifies or rejects, and that the jury is given. The parties must be permitted to make a record of any objections to, or arguments concerning, the jury instructions. Subsection (c). Rule 51(c) conforms to the federal rule, except the second sentence in Rule 51(c)(1) is retained from former NRCP 51(a)(1). Subsection (d). Rule 51(d)(1) retains the requirement from former NRCP 51(b)(3) that the court must give jury instructions before closing arguments. At least one copy of the jury instructions must be given to the jury. Subsection (e). Rule 51(e) conforms to FRCP 51(d). Subsection (f). Rule 51(0(1) is new and authorizes giving preliminary jury instructions. It contemplates that the court will give preliminary instructions before opening statements but affords the court the flexibility to do so later if appropriate. Rule 51(0(2) corresponds to former NRCP 51(e). The provision mirrors language in the advisory committee notes to the 2003 amendments to the federal rule.

Drafter’s Note, Amendment Effective January 1, 2005: The rule is amended to conform to the 2003 amendments to the federal rule with a few exceptions. Subdivision (a) governs requests. It mirrors subdivision (a) of the federal rule with some exceptions noted below. Subdivision (a)(1) retains the first sentence of the former rule with some technical amendments. The provision differs from the federal rule in that it specifies that written requests must be filed in the format directed by the court, requires a party to provide a citation to or a copy of any legal precedent that the party relies on to support or object to a requested instruction, and requires the requesting party to file an original and one copy of each requested instruction and to number the instructions on the copies and indicate who filed them. Subdivision (a)(2) is identical to the 2003 amendments to the federal rule and addresses unanticipated and untimely requests. Subdivisions (b)(1)(A) and (B) track the 2003 amendments to subdivision (b)(1) and (2) of the federal rule. Subdivision (b)(1)(A) requires the court to inform the parties of the proposed instructions and the proposed action on requested instructions before instructing the jury and before final jury arguments. Subdivision (b)(1)(B) carries forward the opportunity to object established by former Rule 51, but it makes explicit the opportunity to object on the record. Subdivision (b)(2) is unique to the Nevada rule. It addresses proper record keeping regarding given and refused jury instructions and is based in part on Hawaii Rule of Civil Procedure 51(c) and in part on NRS 16.110. Subdivision (b)(3) addresses when the court should instruct the jury. The federal rule and the former Nevada rule are revised to provide that the court shall instruct the jury before final arguments. The phrase “unless a party demands otherwise” in the former Nevada rule is not retained in the revised rule. The final sentence of subdivision (b)(3) is retained from former Rule 51; the federal rule has no counterpart. Subdivision (c) addresses the requirements for a proper objection to an instruction or the failure to give an instruction. The provision conforms to the 2003 amendment to the federal rule. Subdivision (c)(1) retains the requirement in former Rule 51 that the objection state distinctly the matter objected to and the grounds of the objection, but it makes explicit the requirement that the objection be made on the record. Subdivision (c)(2) makes clear when an objection is timely. Subdivision (d) addresses what is required to preserve the right to appeal the giving of an instruction or the failure to give an instruction and the applicability of plain error review where a party fails to preserve the right to appellate review. The provision conforms to the 2003 amendments to the federal rule, with some minor rewording of paragraph (1)(B). Subdivision (e) is unique to the Nevada rule. It addresses the scope of the rule. The provision mirrors language in the advisory committee notes to the 2003 amendments to the federal rule.

Amendment History

Amended eff. 2-15-55; Amended eff. 1-1-05; Amended eff. 3-1-19.

Plain-English Summary

Parties submit written requests for jury instructions by the close of the evidence, or earlier if the court sets a deadline for them. Late requests are still allowed for issues that could not reasonably have been anticipated by that point, or with the court's permission for any other issue. Requests have to follow whatever format the court directs, and a party relying on a statute, rule, or case to support a requested instruction has to cite it or attach a copy. Before instructing the jury, the court has to lay out its proposed instructions and its planned ruling on every request, and give the parties a chance to object on the record, outside the jury's hearing. The court and parties then have to keep a record of what was proposed, what the court rejected or changed, and what went to the jury in the end, with any modification to an instruction clearly identified.

An objection has to state, distinctly, what instruction or omission is being challenged and why. It counts as timely if made at that pre-instruction conference, or, if a party was not told about an instruction or ruling beforehand, promptly after learning of it. An error in an instruction the court gave is preserved by a proper objection; a failure to give a requested instruction is preserved by the request itself plus a proper objection, unless the court already refused the request in a definitive ruling on the record, in which case no further objection is needed. A court may still consider a plain error affecting substantial rights even without that preservation. Instructions are read to the jury before closing arguments, with room for the court to add further instructions afterward if the closing arguments make that necessary; the final set is bound together, signed by the court, and given to the jury, and once the jury reaches a verdict and is discharged, all of the instructions become part of the trial court record. The rule leaves room for preliminary instructions given before the evidence starts, and makes clear it governs only instructions on the law that controls the verdict, not instructions to a jury venire or cautionary and limiting instructions given on the spot in response to something that happens at trial.

Frequently Asked Questions

When do I need to submit my proposed jury instructions?

By the close of the evidence at the latest, or earlier if the court sets its own deadline. Late requests are allowed for issues that could not reasonably have been anticipated by then, or with the court's permission.

What do I have to say to preserve an objection to a jury instruction?

State distinctly, on the record, what you are objecting to and why. Raise it at the pre-instruction conference, or, if you were not told about the instruction beforehand, promptly after you learn of it.

Can an appellate court review a jury instruction error I never objected to at trial?

Only as plain error affecting substantial rights. Rule 51 otherwise requires a properly preserved objection before an instruction error can be raised on appeal.

When are jury instructions given to the jury relative to closing arguments?

Before closing arguments, though the court may give additional instructions afterward if something in the closing arguments makes that necessary.

Does Rule 51 apply to preliminary instructions given at the start of trial?

The rule does not prevent preliminary instructions, and several of its procedures apply if they are given, but its core focus, and its preservation requirements, are aimed at the instructions that govern the verdict, not instructions to the jury venire or cautionary instructions given in the moment.

Source & verification. Rule text, official Advisory Committee Notes, and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure, adopted by the Supreme Court of Nevada. Last verified July 14, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: jury instructions nevada civilobjecting to jury instructions nevadaproposed jury instructions nevadapreserving instruction error on appealplain error jury instruction