Rule 30.Depositions by oral examination
Group V: Disclosures and Discovery · Last amended March 1, 2019 · Last verified July 14, 2026
Full Text of Rule 30
Notes
Drafter’s Note, Amendment Effective January 1, 2005: Former subdivision (a) is repealed. New subdivision (a) conforms to the federal rule, as amended in 1993. It provides that leave of court is not required to take a deposition except as set forth in paragraph (2). Paragraph (2)(A) of the federal rule, which limits the number of depositions that may be taken is not included in the Nevada rule. Paragraphs (2)(B) and (C) of the federal rule are redesignated as paragraphs (2)(A) and (B) and adopted with minor modifications to reflect practice in state court. Subdivision (b) is amended to conform to the federal rule, as amended in 1993, with some exceptions. The amendments to paragraph (1) are technical, but the 15-day minimum notice of examination is retained. Former paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) are repealed. New paragraph (2) permits the party noticing the deposition to choose the method of recording and permits recording by nonstenographic means. It is noted that the last two sentences of the first paragraph of former subdivision (b)(2) are deleted because they are redundant to Rule 26(g) and because Rule 11 no longer applies to discovery requests. New paragraph (3) permits other parties to arrange for recording by a means in addition to that selected by the person noticing the deposition. Unlike its federal counterpart, paragraph (3) of the Nevada rule requires 5 days’ notice to the deponent and other parties. New paragraph (4) provides that all depositions be recorded by an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28 and includes procedures to protect the utility and integrity of nonstenographic recordings. Paragraph (6) is amended to require a subpoena to depose an organization, remove the phrase have knowledge of’ from the second sentence, and provide that the subpoena must advise a nonparty organization of its duty to designate a person who consents to testify on its behalf. Paragraph (7) is amended to permit the taking of a deposition by other remote electronic means in addition to telephonic means, but it retains telephonic deposition procedures that do not appear in the federal rule. Subdivision (c) is amended to conform to the federal rule, as amended in 1993. The fourth sentence of the former subdivision is repealed consistent with the new provisions of subdivision (b). The other revisions are intended to reduce the number of interruptions during depositions and complement the new provisions of subdivision (d)(1). Subdivision (d) is amended to conform to the federal rule, as amended in 1993, by adding two new paragraphs. New paragraph (1) requires that any objection during a deposition be made concisely and in a non-argumentative and non-suggestive manner. It also prohibits instructing a deponent not to answer except in three specific circumstances. Paragraph (2) of the federal rule, as amended in 2000, limits depositions to one day of seven hours; this provision is not included in the Nevada rule. Paragraph (3) of the federal rule is redesignated and adopted as new paragraph (2) of the Nevada rule. It authorizes the court or discovery commissioner to impose sanctions when a fair examination of the deponent is impeded, delayed or otherwise frustrated. Paragraph (3) retains the provisions of the former subdivision (d) and corresponds to paragraph (4) of the federal rule. Subdivision (e) is amended to conform to the federal rule, as amended in 1993. Under the amended provision, review of the deposition transcript by the deponent is required only if requested before the deposition is completed. Subdivision (f) is amended to conform to the federal rule, as amended in 1980 and 1993, with the exception of paragraph (3) of the federal rule. Paragraph (1) is amended to require a written certificate from the officer accompany the record of the deposition, which is sealed and sent to the party who arranged for the transcript or recording for safekeeping. Other amendments clarify the use of originals or copies of documents as exhibits to a deposition. The first sentence in paragraph (2) is new and generally provides that the officer must retain stenographic notes or a copy of the recording of any deposition. The amendments to subdivision (g) are technical. The rule retains in both paragraphs the word “shall” rather than “may,” which is used in the federal rule. The Nevada rule also retains the good cause exception in both paragraphs, which does not appear in the federal rule. Subdivision (h) is retained with some modifications. It has no federal counterpart. Paragraph (1) is amended to eliminate confusion concerning responsibility for travel expenses for a party’s expert to attend a deposition noticed by another party.
Advisory Committee Note — 2019 Amendment: The amendments generally conform Rule 30 to FRCP 30, but retain NRCP 30(h), which governs fees associated with expert depositions. Consistent with the federal rule, Rule 30(a)(2)(A)(i) now limits the parties to 10 depositions per side absent stipulation or court order. The Nevada rule, however, does not count depositions of custodians of records toward the 10-deposition limit per side. The “7 hours of testimony” specified in Rule 30(d)(1) means 7 hours on the record. The time taken for convenience breaks, recess for a meal, or an adjournment under Rule 30(d)(3) does not count as deposition time. Discussion between the deponent and counsel during a convenience break is not privileged unless counsel called the break to preserve a privilege, to enforce a limitation ordered by the court, or to present a motion under Rule 30(d)(3). After a privilege-assessment break, counsel for the deponent must place on the record: (1) that a conference took place; (2) the subject of the conference; and (3) the result of the conference, i.e., whether to assert privilege or not. Coyote Springs Inv., LLC v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 131 Nev. 140, 149, 347 P.3d 267, 273 (2015). If a deposition is recorded by audio or audiovisual means and is later transcribed, any dispute regarding the accuracy of the transcription or of multiple competing transcriptions should be resolved by the court or discovery commissioner.
Amendment History
Amended eff. 9-27-71; Amended eff. 3-29-82; Amended 12-13-85, eff. 2-11-86; Amended 7-1-87, eff. 1-1-88; Amended eff. 1-1-05; Amended 12-19-13, eff. 3-1-14; Amended 2-25-14, eff. 5-1-14; Amended eff. 3-1-19.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 30 is the workhorse of Nevada discovery, and it covers a deposition from the first notice to the final page of the transcript. Once the case conference report has cleared the way for discovery, a party can depose any person, including another party, without asking the court first, subject to a short list of exceptions: the deposition would push either side past ten depositions in the case, not counting depositions taken solely of a records custodian; the same person has already been deposed; the party wants to jump ahead of the normal discovery start date without showing the witness is about to leave Nevada; or the witness is confined in prison. A party noticing a deposition has to give at least 14 days' written notice stating the time, place, and, if known, the deponent's name and address, and has to say upfront how the testimony will be recorded, whether by stenographic, audio, or audiovisual means.
Subdivision (b)(6) is Nevada's organizational deposition mechanism, and it works the same way its federal counterpart does: a party can name a corporation, partnership, association, or government agency as the deponent and must describe the topics for examination with reasonable particularity. The organization, not the party seeking the deposition, then picks who will testify, designating one or more officers, directors, or managing agents, or any other person who consents to speak on its behalf, about whatever it knows or can reasonably find out on those topics. A subpoena served on a nonparty organization has to spell out this duty to designate a witness, and using this procedure does not stop a party from deposing an individual through some other means if that fits the case better.
The rest of the rule sets the ground rules for how the deposition runs and what happens afterward. The officer presiding has to open the record with names, the date and place, and who is present; objections must be stated concisely without argument or coaching, and a lawyer can instruct a witness not to answer only to preserve a privilege, enforce a court-ordered limit, or set up a motion to cut the deposition short for bad faith or harassment. A deposition is capped at one day of seven hours of testimony unless the parties agree otherwise or the court extends it, and the court can sanction whoever is impeding a fair examination. A deponent who asks before the deposition ends gets 30 days after the transcript becomes available to review it and note any changes, and Nevada adds its own wrinkle not found in the federal rule: when a party notices the deposition of a testifying expert, that party generally has to pay the expert's reasonable hourly or daily fee for the time spent answering questions, and any other party who wants to question the same expert is on the hook for that portion of the fee, with a process for challenging a fee the court finds unreasonable.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition in Nevada?
It is a deposition where a party names a corporation, partnership, association, or governmental agency as the deponent and describes the topics for examination with reasonable particularity. The organization then designates one or more officers, directors, managing agents, or other consenting persons to testify about what it knows or can reasonably find out on those topics. Nevada uses the same (b)(6) numbering as the federal rule, so a request for a corporate designee deposition here is properly called a 30(b)(6) deposition.
How is deposing an organization under 30(b)(6) different from deposing one employee?
Deposing a single employee only gets you that person's own knowledge. A 30(b)(6) notice binds the organization itself: whoever it designates has to testify to what the organization as a whole knows or can reasonably find out on the listed topics, even if that means the designee has to prepare using other people's knowledge.
When do I need the court's permission to take a deposition?
Mainly when the deposition would push either side past ten depositions in the case, when the same person has already been deposed once, when you want to depose someone before the normal discovery start date without showing the witness is about to leave the state, or when the witness is confined in prison.
How long can a deposition last, and can a witness be ordered to sit for more time?
A deposition is generally limited to one day of seven hours of testimony, but the court has to allow more time if it is needed for a fair examination, including situations where the deponent or someone else is impeding or delaying the questioning.
Who pays the expert's fee when a party deposes the other side's testifying expert?
The party who noticed the deposition generally pays the expert's reasonable hourly or daily fee for the time spent being examined. If another party also questions the expert at the same deposition, that party is responsible for the fee tied to its own portion of the questioning, and either side can ask the court to set a reasonable fee if it thinks the expert's rate is too high.