Rule 13.Counterclaim and crossclaim
Group III: Pleadings and Motions · Last amended March 1, 2019 · Last verified July 14, 2026
Full Text of Rule 13
Notes
Drafter’s Note, Amendment Effective January 1, 2005: The amendments are technical.
Advisory Committee Note — 2019 Amendment: Consistent with FRCP 13, former NRCP 13(f) is deleted as duplicative; an amendment to a pleading to add a counterclaim may be made under Rule 15.
Amendment History
Amended eff. 3-16-64; Amended eff. 9-27-71; Amended eff. 1-1-05; Amended eff. 3-1-19.
Plain-English Summary
A pleading must include as a counterclaim any claim the pleader already holds against an opposing party if it arises from the same transaction or occurrence as the opposing party's claim and does not require adding a party the court cannot reach. Two exceptions excuse a pleader from stating it: the claim was already the subject of another pending action when this case started, or the opposing party sued through attachment or similar process that did not give the court personal jurisdiction over the pleader, and the pleader is not asserting any counterclaim at all. Beyond these compulsory claims, a pleader may raise any other, unrelated claim against an opposing party as a permissive counterclaim, and the relief sought in either kind of counterclaim need not offset the opposing claim — it can exceed it in amount or differ entirely in kind.
Rule 13 does not expand any existing right to counterclaim, or claim a credit, against the State, its political subdivisions, or their current or former officers and employees — whatever limits already exist on suing the government stay in place. A counterclaim that matures or is acquired only after a party has already filed its pleading can still come into the case through a supplemental pleading with the court's permission. Between coparties, a crossclaim is allowed when it arises from the same transaction or occurrence as the original action or a counterclaim, or relates to property at issue in the case, and it can include a claim that the coparty is or may be liable for all or part of a claim already asserted against the crossclaimant. Adding new parties to a counterclaim or crossclaim follows Rules 19 and 20, and if the court orders separate trials, it can still enter judgment on a counterclaim or crossclaim under Rule 54(b) even after the opposing party's claims have been dismissed or resolved.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if I forget to bring a counterclaim that arose from the same dispute?
A counterclaim arising from the same transaction or occurrence as the opposing party's claim is compulsory, meaning it generally must be raised in that case or it is lost, unless one of Rule 13(a)(2)'s narrow exceptions applies.
Can I bring a counterclaim against the State of Nevada if it sues me?
Rule 13 does not expand whatever right already exists to counterclaim or claim a credit against the State, its political subdivisions, or their officers and employees; the rule preserves existing limits rather than creating new counterclaim rights.
Can my counterclaim ask for more than the plaintiff is seeking from me?
Yes. Rule 13(c) allows a counterclaim to request relief that exceeds in amount or differs entirely in kind from the relief the opposing party seeks.
What if my counterclaim didn't exist yet when I filed my answer?
Rule 13(e) allows the court to permit a supplemental pleading asserting a counterclaim that matured or was acquired after the earlier pleading was served.
Can I bring a claim against a co-defendant instead of the plaintiff?
Yes, through a crossclaim under Rule 13(g), available when the claim arises from the same transaction or occurrence as the original action or a counterclaim, or relates to property at issue in the case.