Rule 9.Answers; Defenses; Forms of Denials
Group III: Pleadings and Motions · Last amended July 1, 2017 · Last verified July 14, 2026
Full Text of Rule 9
Comment
Pleadings which notify the opposing party and the court of the factual and legal basis of the pleader's claims or defenses better define the issues of fact and law to be adjudicated. This definition should give the opposing party and the court sufficient information to determine whether the claim or defense is sufficient in law to merit continued litigation. Pleadings should assist in setting practical limits on the scope of discovery and trial and should give the court sufficient information to control and supervise the progress of the case. Answers are to comply with statutory requirements that pertain to brief statements of defense. See RSA 515:3, 524:2, 565:7, and 547-C:10. This rule changes current practice in that it requires a defendant to file an Answer within 30 days after the defendant is served with the Complaint. The practice under prior law whereby, in actions at law, the defendant's entry of an appearance operated as a general denial of all allegations of the plaintiff's writ has been eliminated. Section (b) of the rule extends the time for filing an Answer if the defendant moves to dismiss the Complaint. If a motion to dismiss is filed, the Answer is not due until 30 days after the clerk's notice of the court's decision finally denying the motion. Except for challenges to personal jurisdiction, to the sufficiency of process or to the sufficiency of service of process, any defense that can be raised by motion also can alternatively be raised in an Answer. Section (d) of the rule makes clear that affirmative defenses are deemed waived if they are not raised in an Answer or a motion to dismiss filed within 30 days after the defendant is served with the Complaint. Section (e) requires that motions to dismiss based on a challenge to the court's personal jurisdiction, the sufficiency of process, or the sufficiency of service of process must be raised by motion to dismiss filed within 30 days after service of the Complaint. This subsection is intended to modify long standing New Hampshire practice concerning the manner in which a litigant who desires to challenge the court's personal jurisdiction or the adequacy of process or service of process must proceed. Under prior law, a litigant desiring to make such challenges was required to enter a special appearance and to file a motion to dismiss within 30 days after being served. If the litigant failed to follow this course, or if the litigant filed an Answer or pleading that raised any other issues, the litigant would be deemed to have submitted to the court's jurisdiction and thus waived his or her challenge to personal jurisdiction or the adequacy of process or service of process. Under the new rule, a litigant desiring to challenge personal jurisdiction or the sufficiency of process or the service of process must still do so by filing a motion to dismiss within 30 days after being served. However the litigant is not required to enter a "special appearance," nor will the litigant be deemed to have waived such challenges and submitted to the court's jurisdiction by filing an Answer or other pleadings or motions that raise issues aside from personal jurisdiction, sufficiency of process or sufficiency of service of process. In accordance with Mosier v. Kinley, 142 N.H. 415, 423-24 (1997), the new rule preserves the requirement that a litigant whose motion to dismiss on these grounds is denied by the trial court must seek an immediate appeal of the trial court's ruling, or be deemed to have waived these challenges.
Amendment History
Adopted May 22, 2013, eff. October 1, 2013; amended September 24, 2013, eff. October 1, 2013; July 24, 2014, eff. September 1, 2014; April 20, 2017, eff. July 1, 2017.
2017: The 2017 amendment added the second sentence of the introductory language of (d) and (d)(1) through (d)(18).
2014: The 2014 amendment added the last two sentences of (a); in (b), substituted "Instead of an Answer, a person responding to a pleading to which a response is required may" for "An Answer shall be filed," deleted "filing said pleading" following "after the person," deleted "unless defendant" following the second occurrence of "response is required," and deleted "within that time period" at the end of the first sentence and substituted "section (e)" for "section (f)" in the second sentence; deleted former (d); redesignated former (e) and (f) as (d) and (e); rewrote (e); and made a stylistic change.
2013: Substituted "or file" for "and/or file", inserted "affirmative defenses, including" following "based on" and deleted "or improper venue" preceding "within the time" in subdiv. (e) and substituted "rule makes clear that affirmative defenses are" for "rule requires that defenses based on the statute of limitations or challenges to venue are" in the fourth paragraph of the Comment.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 9(a) requires an Answer within 30 days of being served, stating the pleader's defenses in short, plain terms and admitting or denying each allegation specifically. General denials are not allowed; a party must address particular allegations or paragraphs, and if only part of an allegation is true, the Answer must admit that part and deny the rest. The rule has real teeth for silence: an Answer that neither admits nor denies an allegation is treated as an admission, and any well-pleaded fact in the Complaint that goes unaddressed in the Answer is deemed admitted. The same 30 days also covers filing an Appearance under Rule 17.
Rule 9(b) gives a defendant an alternative to answering right away: a Motion to Dismiss filed within that same 30 days. If the motion is denied, the Answer is due 30 days after notice of that denial — except where the motion challenges personal jurisdiction, sufficiency of process, or sufficiency of service of process, which follows the separate timeline in Rule 9(e). Rule 9(c) requires a defendant who wants a jury trial to say so on the first page of the Answer, mirroring the plaintiff's obligation in Rule 8(c); silence waives the right.
Rule 9(d) lists eighteen affirmative defenses — from accord and satisfaction through waiver, including the statute of limitations — that are waived unless raised in the Answer or in a Motion to Dismiss within the 30-day window. Rule 9(e) sets out a distinct and unusually detailed path for challenges to personal jurisdiction, process, or service: these are not waived by filing an Answer or other motions on different issues, but they are waived if not raised by Motion to Dismiss within 30 days of service. If the trial court denies that motion, the official Comment explains that the New Hampshire Supreme Court's decision in Mosier v. Kinley requires the challenging party to seek immediate appellate review or be deemed to have waived the challenge — which is why Rule 9(e)(1)-(3) lays out precise follow-up deadlines depending on whether the party appeals, the supreme court declines the appeal, or the supreme court rejects the challenge on the merits.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long do I have to file an Answer after being served with a Complaint?
Rule 9(a) gives you 30 days after being served with the pleading to file your Answer, and you must also file an Appearance under Rule 17 within that same 30 days.
Can I just generally deny everything in the Complaint?
No. Rule 9(a) requires specific denials directed at designated allegations or paragraphs rather than a blanket general denial, and it requires you to admit the part of an allegation that is true if you intend in good faith to deny only part of it.
What happens if I don't address one of the plaintiff's factual allegations in my Answer?
Rule 9(a) treats any well-alleged fact in the Complaint that is not denied or explained in the Answer as admitted, so silence on an allegation is risky.
If I file a Motion to Dismiss instead of an Answer and it gets denied, when is my Answer due?
Generally, 30 days after notice of the decision denying the motion. If the motion challenged personal jurisdiction, sufficiency of process, or sufficiency of service of process, the timeline instead follows the more detailed schedule in Rule 9(e), which depends on whether you seek appellate review of the denial.
Do I waive a defense like the statute of limitations if I don't raise it right away?
Yes. Rule 9(d) lists eighteen affirmative defenses, including the statute of limitations, that are waived unless pleaded in the Answer or raised by Motion to Dismiss within 30 days of being served.