Rule 50.Deposit in Court
Group IX: Provisional and Final Remedies · Last amended October 1, 2013 · Last verified July 14, 2026
Full Text of Rule 50
Amendment History
Adopted May 22, 2013, eff. October 1, 2013.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 50 gives a defendant a way to concede part of a claim without conceding all of it. In a proper case, the defendant can pay into court the sum it admits is due, while still contesting the balance through the general issue. If the plaintiff refuses that payment along with costs as full satisfaction of the claim, the conceded sum is struck from the complaint. If the plaintiff then fails to prove that a larger sum is owed, the plaintiff recovers no costs at all, and the defendant instead recovers costs running from the date of the payment forward.
Rule 50(b) applies the same mechanism where a set-off, counterclaim, or recoupment is in play. There, the balance the defendant concedes owing the plaintiff is paid into court along with the plaintiff's costs up to that point, and if the defendant ultimately prevails, the defendant recovers only the costs incurred after that payment. In both versions of the rule, the practical effect is to reward accurate assessment of a claim's true value and to penalize a party who insists on litigating over an amount the other side was willing to pay all along.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does Rule 50 let a defendant do?
It lets the defendant pay into court a sum of money it admits is owed to the plaintiff, while still contesting the balance of the claim through the general issue.
What happens if the plaintiff refuses the money the defendant pays into court?
If the plaintiff refuses to accept that sum with costs as full satisfaction of the claim, the sum is struck from the complaint. Unless the plaintiff then proves a larger amount is due, the plaintiff recovers no costs, and the defendant recovers costs from the time of the payment.
How does a counterclaim or set-off change how Rule 50 works?
Under Rule 50(b), when a set-off, counterclaim, or recoupment has been filed and a balance is paid into court, the plaintiff's costs up to that point must also be paid into court, and a prevailing defendant recovers only the costs incurred after that point.
Does paying money into court end the lawsuit?
No. Rule 50 addresses only the conceded portion of the claim. The case continues as to whatever balance the plaintiff still disputes.
Why would a defendant use the deposit-in-court option instead of just contesting the whole claim?
It limits the defendant's exposure to costs on the part of the claim it does not dispute, and it puts pressure on the plaintiff to accept a fair conceded amount rather than risk losing the right to costs by holding out for more than can be proven.