Rule 30.Mediation
Group VI: Alternatives to Trial · Last amended October 1, 2013 · Last verified July 14, 2026
Full Text of Rule 30
Amendment History
Adopted May 22, 2013, eff. October 1, 2013.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 30 gives the Superior Court authority to send any civil case to mediation. It is a short rule, but a flexible one: parties who would rather try something else — neutral evaluation, non-binding arbitration, or binding arbitration — can agree to that instead of standard mediation. They can also opt for private mediation on their own, either replacing or supplementing the court-ordered process, and they may ask the presiding judge to hand a complex case off to another judge for intensive mediation.
Whatever form the process takes, Rule 30(e) keeps it nonbinding by default. Unless the parties agree otherwise, nothing that happens in mediation forecloses a litigant's right to go to trial. The rule sets the framework; the details of court-ordered mediation, ADR generally, arbitration, and judge-conducted intensive mediation are filled in by Rules 32, 33, and 34.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can the court force parties into mediation?
Yes. Rule 30(a) allows the court to order the parties in any civil action to participate in mediation.
Do the parties have to accept mediation, or can they choose something else?
If the parties agree, Rule 30(b) lets them substitute a different form of alternative dispute resolution, such as neutral evaluation, non-binding arbitration, or binding arbitration, in place of mediation.
Can parties hire their own mediator instead of using the court's process?
Yes. Rule 30(c) allows the parties to agree to private mediation, either instead of or in addition to the mediation the court has ordered.
How does a complex case get assigned to intensive mediation?
Rule 30(d) lets the parties ask the presiding judge to assign a complex case to another judge for intensive mediation, a process spelled out further in Rule 34.
Is a party bound by what happens in mediation under this rule?
No, not unless the parties agree otherwise. Rule 30(e) states that proceedings under the rule are nonbinding and do not impair a litigant's right to go to trial.