Rule 51.Instructions to Jury
Group VI: Trials · Last amended March 1, 2011 · Last verified July 15, 2026
Full Text of Rule 51
Explanatory Note
Rule 51 was amended, effective 1971; March 1, 1990; March 1, 1999; March 1, 2005; March 1, 2011. Rule 51 was amended, effective March 1, 2005, in response to the December 2003 amendment of Fed.R.Civ.P. 51. The language and organization of the rule were changed to make the rule more easily understandable. New language in subdivisions (a), (c) and (d) clarifies the procedure for requesting instructions and for objecting to court action on instructions and requests. Rule 51 was amended, effective March 1, 2011, in response to the December 1, 2007, revision of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The language and organization of the rule were changed to make the rule more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 51(a) gives parties a window to request jury instructions in writing, at the close of the evidence or at any earlier reasonable time the court sets. After the evidence closes, a party can still request instructions on issues that couldn't reasonably have been anticipated earlier, and with the court's permission, can request instructions on anything else too. A party may ask for a North Dakota pattern jury instruction just by citing its number, and the court can require each request on its own separate sheet.
Rule 51(b) builds in a checkpoint before the jury hears final arguments: the court must tell the parties what it plans to instruct and how it plans to rule on their requests, and give them a chance to object on the record, outside the jury's hearing, before the instructions and arguments are delivered. Instructions themselves can be given any time between the start of trial and the jury's discharge. Right after the jury is sworn, the court may cover jury duties and conduct, the order of proceedings, elementary legal principles, and — if the court allows jurors to submit written questions to witnesses under N.D.R.Ct. 6.8 — the procedure for doing so. Final instructions must be in writing unless the parties agree otherwise; written instructions go to the jury signed by the court, oral instructions reach the jury only if transcribed and the court so orders, and every instruction the jury used in deliberations must come back to the court once the verdict is in.
Rule 51(c) requires an objection to state distinctly, on the record, what's being objected to and why. The objection is timely if made at the opportunity the court gave under Rule 51(b)(1)(B), or, if the party wasn't told about the instruction or ruling before that point, promptly after learning of it. Rule 51(d) lets a party assign error only in an instruction given after a proper objection, or a failure to give one after a proper request — but the court can still notice and fix a plain error in the instructions affecting a substantial right even without that preservation.
Frequently Asked Questions
By when do I need to submit written requests for jury instructions?
Rule 51(a)(1) says requests should be filed and furnished to every other party at the close of the evidence, or at any earlier reasonable time the court sets for them.
Can I still ask for a jury instruction after the evidence has closed?
Yes, in two situations under Rule 51(a)(2): for issues that couldn't reasonably have been anticipated by the earlier deadline the court set, or for anything else, but only with the court's permission.
How do I preserve an objection to a jury instruction for appeal?
Rule 51(c) requires stating, on the record, exactly what you're objecting to and why. The objection is timely if made at the opportunity the court gives before instructions and closing arguments, or promptly after you learn of the instruction if you weren't told about it beforehand.
Can I ask the court to use a North Dakota pattern jury instruction without writing it out in full?
Yes. Rule 51(a)(3) allows a request for a North Dakota pattern jury instruction just by referring to its instruction number.
Can an appellate court fix a jury-instruction error I didn't object to at trial?
Rule 51(d)(2) allows the court to consider a plain error in the instructions that affects a substantial right, even though it wasn't preserved through a proper objection or request under Rule 51(d)(1).