RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 2.One Form of Action

Group I: Scope and Purpose of Rules--One Form of Action · Last amended March 1, 2011 · Last verified July 15, 2026

In one sentenceRule 2 abolishes the old distinction between actions at law and suits in equity, replacing every form of lawsuit with a single “civil action,” while leaving intact North Dakota's constitutional right to a jury trial in cases where a jury could have been demanded at common law.

Full Text of Rule 2

Text size

There is one form of action - the civil action.

Explanatory Note

Rule 2 was amended, effective March 1, 2011. This rule is identical to Fed.R.Civ.P. 2, and provides for one form of action to be known as a "civil action." The old

forms of action have been abolished, as has the distinction between "law" and "equity" cases. Even though one form of action has been substituted for actions at law and in equity, a distinction persists so far

as the right to a jury trial is concerned. Article I, § 13 of the North Dakota Constitution preserves trial by jury in all cases in which it could have been demanded as a matter of right at common law.

Rule 2 was amended, effective March 1, 2011, in response to the December 1, 2007, revision of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The language and organization of the rule were changed to make the rule more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules.

Plain-English Summary

Rule 2 states its whole rule in seven words: there is one form of action — the civil action. Before rules like this, a lawsuit had to be labeled and processed as either an action at law or a suit in equity, each with its own procedural rulebook. North Dakota, following the federal rules, erased that line. Whatever the substance of a claim, it moves through court as a single kind of case.

Collapsing law and equity into one action did not erase every consequence of the old distinction. The right to a jury trial still depends on history: Article I, Section 13 of the North Dakota Constitution preserves the right to a jury in any case where a jury could have been demanded as a matter of right at common law. A court deciding whether a party is entitled to a jury for a particular claim still has to ask what that claim would have looked like under the old law-versus-equity divide, even though the case itself is filed and litigated as one unified civil action.

Rule 2 was last amended in 2011, and that change was cosmetic rather than substantive — part of a rule-wide rewrite meant to make the rules easier to read and more consistent in style and terminology, prompted by the federal rules' 2007 restyling. The core idea, one form of action, has held since well before that rewrite.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did North Dakota courts do before Rule 2 combined actions at law and suits in equity?

They had to fit a lawsuit into one of two separate procedural tracks — an action at law or a suit in equity — each with its own rules. Rule 2 abolished that division by creating one form of action, the civil action, that covers both kinds of claims.

Does having one form of action mean I no longer have a right to a jury trial?

No. Article I, Section 13 of the North Dakota Constitution still preserves the right to a jury trial in any case where a jury could have been demanded as a matter of right at common law. Rule 2 unified how cases are filed and processed; it did not change the constitutional jury-trial right.

How do I know if my claim carries a right to a jury trial under this old distinction?

Rule 2 itself does not answer that question — it only establishes the single civil action. Whether a jury trial is available depends on whether the claim is one that could have been tried to a jury as a matter of right at common law, and the demand itself is governed by Rule 38.

Did Rule 2 change anything substantive when it was last amended?

No. The 2011 amendment was part of a style-only rewrite of the rules, made to match the federal rules' 2007 restyling and to keep language and terminology consistent throughout North Dakota's rules. It did not change the one-form-of-action rule itself.

Is North Dakota's Rule 2 different from the federal rule it is based on?

According to the official explanatory note, Rule 2 is identical to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 2. Both establish a single civil action in place of the older forms of action at law and in equity.

Source & verification. Rule text and the Explanatory Note are reproduced verbatim from the North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure, adopted by the Supreme Court of North Dakota. Last verified July 15, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: north dakota one form of action rulecivil action vs law and equity ndnd constitution jury trial rightabolition of law and equity distinction north dakotawhen is a jury trial available in north dakota