Rule 12.Defenses and Objections: When and How; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidation and Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Group III: Pleadings and Motions · Last amended March 1, 2011 · Last verified July 15, 2026
Full Text of Rule 12
Explanatory Note
Rule 12 was amended, effective 1971; January 27, 1977; March 1, 1990; March 1, 2002; September 1, 2004; March 1, 2007; March 1, 2008; March 1, 2011.
This rule is derived from Fed.R.Civ.P. 12. Rule 12 was amended, effective March 1, 2011, in response to the December 1, 2007, revision of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The language and organization of the rule were changed to make the rule more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules. Subdivision (a) has been changed slightly to conform to numbering differences between these rules and the federal rules and to delete references to statutes, agencies, and officers of the United States. Subdivision (a) was amended, effective March 1, 2007, to delete a reference to service of a summons without a complaint. N.D.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(2) requires the complaint to be served with the summons. Paragraph (a)(1) was amended, effective March 1, 2011, to increase the time to serve a responsive pleading from 20 to 21 days. Paragraph (a)(2) was amended, effective March 1, 2011, to increase the time to serve a responsive pleading from 10 to 14 days. Subdivision (b) was amended, effective March 1, 2002, to incorporate a time limitation for an objection to improper venue. Former subdivision (d) was moved and renamed subdivision (i), effective March 1, 2011. Subdivision (e) was amended, effective March 1, 2011, to increase the time from 10 to 14 days. Paragraph (f)(2) was amended, effective March 1, 2011, to increase the time for a court to act on a motion to strike from 20 to 21 days. Former subdivisions (i) and (j) were deleted, effective March 1, 2011.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 12(a) sets the clock for responding to a pleading. A defendant must answer within 21 days of being served with the summons and complaint; a party must answer a counterclaim or crossclaim within 21 days of being served with the pleading that states it; and a reply to an answer is due 21 days after an order to reply, unless that order says otherwise. Filing certain motions resets these deadlines: if the court denies a motion or holds it for trial, the responsive pleading is due 14 days after notice of that ruling, and if the court orders a more definite statement, the response is due 14 days after that statement is served.
Rule 12(b) lists seven defenses a party can raise by motion instead of folding them into a responsive pleading: lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue, insufficient process, insufficient service of process, failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and failure to join a required party under Rule 19. The sixth of these — failure to state a claim — functions as North Dakota's motion-to-dismiss provision, the tool most lawyers mean when they talk about a Rule 12 motion. Raising a defense by motion does not waive it, and joining several defenses in one motion doesn't waive any of them either.
Several related motions round out the rule. After the pleadings close, but early enough that it won't delay trial, either side can move for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c). If a party attaches material outside the pleadings to a Rule 12(b)(6) or 12(c) motion and the court doesn't exclude it, the motion converts into one for summary judgment under Rule 56, and both sides must get a real chance to respond to that outside material. A motion for a more definite statement targets a pleading too vague to answer — it must be filed before answering and point to the specific defects, and if the court orders a more definite statement and it isn't provided within 14 days, the court can strike the pleading or issue another appropriate order. A motion to strike reaches an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter, and the court can act on its own or on a timely motion.
Rule 12(g) and (h) police how and when these defenses must be raised. A party generally must consolidate every available defense into one motion — raising them piecemeal later is barred. Lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue, insufficient process, and insufficient service of process are waived if they're left out of that consolidated motion or never raised by motion or in the answer. Failure to state a claim, failure to join a required party under Rule 19(b), and failure to state a legal defense are treated more forgivingly — they can still be raised in a later pleading, by a Rule 12(c) motion, or even at trial. Lack of subject-matter jurisdiction can never be waived: the court must dismiss the action the moment it determines that jurisdiction is missing, no matter how late in the case that happens. And if a party asks, the court must decide any Rule 12(b) defense or Rule 12(c) motion before trial, unless it orders the issue deferred until then.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is North Dakota's version of a motion to dismiss?
Rule 12(b)(6) — a motion asserting failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. It is the defense most lawyers mean when they refer to a Rule 12 motion, and it lets a defendant challenge the legal sufficiency of a complaint before ever filing an answer.
How long does a defendant have to answer a complaint in North Dakota?
Rule 12(a)(1)(A) gives a defendant 21 days after being served with the summons and complaint to serve an answer, unless another rule or statute sets a different time.
What happens if I attach evidence outside the complaint to my Rule 12(b)(6) motion?
If the court doesn't exclude that outside material, Rule 12(d) converts the motion into one for summary judgment under Rule 56, and every party must be given a reasonable opportunity to present material relevant to that broader motion.
Which defenses get waived if I don't raise them right away?
Under Rule 12(h)(1), lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue, insufficient process, and insufficient service of process are waived if they're omitted from a consolidated motion under this rule or never raised by motion or in the answer.
Can a court dismiss a case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction even late in the litigation?
Yes. Rule 12(h)(3) requires the court to dismiss the action the moment it determines subject-matter jurisdiction is lacking, regardless of when that determination happens or whether any party raised the issue.