Rule 9.Pleading Special Matters
Chapter III: Pleadings and Motions · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 14, 2026
Full Text of Rule 9
Advisory Committee Notes
A party desiring to raise an issue as to the legal existence, capacity, or authority of a party must assert such in the answer. If lack of capacity appears affirmatively on the face of the complaint, the defense may be raised by a motion pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) or Rule 12(c). “Circumstances” in Rule 9(b) refers to matters such as the time, place and contents of the false representations, in addition to the identity of the person who made them and what the person obtained as a result. Rule 9(g) requires a detailed pleading of special damages and only a general pleading of general damages. General damages are damages that are typically caused by, and flow naturally from, the injuries alleged. Special damages are damages that are unusual or atypical for the type of claim asserted. Special damages are required to be pled with specificity so as to give the defendant notice of the nature of the alleged damages. Special damages include, but are not limited to, consequential damages, damages for lost business profit, and punitive damages. See Puckett Machinery Co. v. Edwards, 641 So. 2d 29, 37-38 (Miss. 1994) (consequential damages must be plead with specificity); Lynn v. Soterra, Inc., 802 So. 2d 162, 169 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001) (damages for lost business profit caused by defendant’s blocking of a road are likely special damages). If claimant fails to plead special damages with specificity, an award for such damages may be reversed. The requirement that special damages must be stated with specificity will be waived if special damages are tried by the express or implied consent of the parties pursuant to Rule 15(b).
Plain-English Summary
Rule 9(a) requires a party to state, in the initial pleading, the capacity in which it sues or is sued. Rule 9(b) draws a line that runs through a lot of pleading practice: the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake — the who, what, when, and where — have to be pleaded with particularity, but malice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind can be averred in general terms. Rule 9(c) relaxes the standard for conditions precedent: a party can generally aver that all conditions precedent have occurred, while a denial of that averment has to be specific and particular.
Rules 9(d) and (e) do similar work for official acts and judgments. Pleading an official document or act is satisfied by averring that it was issued or done in compliance with the law, and an ordinance or a special, local, or private statute can be identified by its title or the date it was approved rather than quoted at length. Pleading a judgment or decision of a court, tribunal, board, or officer only requires averring the judgment or decision itself, without pleading the facts that show the decision-maker had jurisdiction to render it. Rule 9(f) treats averments of time and place as material, on the same footing as any other averment, when a pleading's sufficiency is tested.
Rule 9(g) requires items of special damage to be specifically stated — a stricter standard than the general pleading rule for damages that flow naturally from the injury alleged. Rules 9(h) and (i) address parties whose identities aren't yet known: a party ignorant of an opposing party's name can designate that party by any name and later substitute the true name once it's discovered, giving proper notice, and unknown parties in interest can likewise be designated as such.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I have to plead the details of fraud in my complaint?
Rule 9(b) requires the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake to be pleaded with particularity. A person's state of mind, such as intent or knowledge, can still be averred generally.
How do I plead that a condition precedent to my claim was satisfied?
Rule 9(c) allows a general averment that all conditions precedent have been performed or have occurred. A denial of that averment must be specific and made with particularity.
What's the difference between special damages and general damages for pleading purposes?
Rule 9(g) requires items of special damage to be specifically stated. General damages, which flow naturally from the injury alleged, don't require that same level of itemization.
Can I sue someone whose real name I don't know yet?
Rule 9(h) lets a party who is ignorant of an opposing party's name designate that party by any name, then substitute the true name once discovered, with proper notice to that party.
Where do I state the capacity I'm suing or being sued in?
Rule 9(a) requires that capacity to be stated in the initial pleading.