Rule 56.Summary Judgment
Chapter VII: Judgment · Last amended January 16, 2020 · Last verified July 14, 2026
Full Text of Rule 56
Advisory Committee Notes
It is important to distinguish between a Rule 56 motion for summary judgment, a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and a Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings. When ruling on a Rule 56 motion for summary judgment, the trial court may “pierce the pleadings” and consider extrinsic evidence, such as affidavits, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions. When ruling on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the trial court may not “pierce the pleadings” and shall only consider the allegations contained in the pleading asserting the claim. Similarly, when ruling on a Rule 12(c) motion on the pleadings, the trial court shall only consider the allegations within the pleadings. If matters outside the pleadings are presented to and considered by the trial court in connection with a motion for judgment on the pleadings or a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the trial court must treat the motion as one for summary judgment and give all parties a reasonable opportunity to present pertinent material. See M.R.C.P. 12(b) and (c).
A trial court need not make findings of fact when ruling on a motion for summary judgment because “a Rule 56 summary judgment hearing is not an action ‘tried upon the facts without a jury’ so as to trigger Rule 52 applicability.” See Harmon v. Regions Bank, 961 So. 2d 693, 700 (Miss. 2007). See also Uniform Rules of Circuit and County Court Practice.
Although the Court has held that an affidavit is not always required to obtain relief under Rule 56(f), a party must “present specific facts why he cannot oppose the motion” and must specifically demonstrate “how postponement of a ruling on the motion will enable him, by discovery or other means, to rebut the movant’s showing.” Howarth v. M & H Ventures, LLC, 237 So. 3d 107, 113 (Miss. 2007).
Plain-English Summary
Rule 56 gives either side a way to end a case, or part of one, without a trial. A claimant — someone pursuing a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or declaratory judgment — can move for summary judgment once thirty days have passed since the action began, or as soon as the other side serves its own summary judgment motion. A defending party faces no such waiting period and can move at any time. Either motion can be filed with or without supporting affidavits.
The motion has to be served at least ten days before the hearing, and the opposing party can serve affidavits any time before the hearing itself. The standard is exacting: judgment is warranted only when the pleadings, depositions, interrogatory answers, admissions, and any affidavits on file show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The rule allows the court to grant judgment on liability alone, as an interlocutory ruling, even while a genuine dispute over the amount of damages remains open. When a summary judgment motion doesn't dispose of the whole case, Rule 56(d) has the court dig into what remains contested — examining the pleadings and evidence and questioning counsel — and issue an order pinning down which facts are established for trial, so the trial itself can move faster.
Affidavits filed under this rule have their own rules: they must rest on personal knowledge, state facts that would be admissible at trial, and show the affiant is competent to testify to them, with sworn or certified copies of any referenced documents attached. Once a properly supported motion is on file, the party opposing it can't rest on the allegations or denials in its own pleadings — it has to come forward with specific facts showing a genuine issue for trial, or risk having judgment entered against it. If a party can't yet marshal the facts it needs, Rule 56(f) lets the court refuse the motion or order a continuance for more discovery. And the rule has teeth on both sides: affidavits filed in bad faith or purely to delay can bring an order to pay the other side's expenses and fees, and even a contempt finding, while denial of summary judgment automatically entitles the prevailing party to its reasonable expenses of attending the hearing, and — if the court also finds the motion was without reasonable cause — can add an award of attorney's fees.
Frequently Asked Questions
When can a plaintiff move for summary judgment in Mississippi?
Rule 56(a) lets a party seeking to recover on a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or declaratory judgment move for summary judgment after thirty days have passed since the action was commenced, or after the adverse party serves its own summary judgment motion, whichever applies. Rule 56(b) lets a defending party move at any time, with no waiting period.
What standard does the court apply in deciding whether to grant summary judgment?
The court grants the motion when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions, and any affidavits on file show there's no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
How much notice do I get before a Mississippi summary judgment hearing?
Rule 56(c) requires the motion to be served at least ten days before the hearing date, and the opposing party can serve affidavits any time before the day of the hearing itself.
Can the court grant summary judgment on liability without deciding the amount of damages?
Yes. Rule 56(c) allows an interlocutory summary judgment on the issue of liability alone even when a genuine issue remains about the amount of damages.
What happens if I can't put together affidavits in time to oppose a summary judgment motion?
Rule 56(f) lets the court refuse the motion or order a continuance so the opposing party can obtain affidavits, take depositions, or pursue other discovery, so long as that party explains why it can't yet present the facts it needs.