Chapter V: Depositions and Discovery · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 14, 2026
In one sentenceRule 36 lets a party ask another to admit specific facts, law-to-fact conclusions, or document authenticity, deems any unanswered request admitted after thirty days (forty-five for a defendant answering after being served), and makes an admission conclusively established for that case unless the court permits it to be withdrawn or amended.
(a)Request for Admission. A party may serve upon any other party a written request for the admission, for purposes of the pending action only, of the truth of any matters within the scope of Rule 26(b) set forth in the request that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law to fact, including the genuineness of any documents described in the request. Copies of documents shall be served with the request unless they have been or are otherwise furnished or made available for inspection and copying. The request may, without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon any other party with or after service of the summons upon that party.
Each matter of which an admission is requested shall be separately set forth. The matter is admitted unless, within thirty days after service of the request, or within such shorter or longer time as the court may allow, the party to whom the request is directed serves upon the party requesting the admission a written answer or objection addressed to the matter, signed by the party or by his attorney, but, unless the court shortens the time, a defendant shall not be required to serve answers or objections before the expiration of forty-five days after service of the summons upon him. If objection is made, the reasons therefor shall be stated. The answer shall specifically deny the matter or set forth in detail the reasons why the answering party cannot truthfully admit or deny the matter. A denial shall fairly meet the substance of the requested admission, and when good faith requires that a party qualify his answer or deny only a part of the matter of which an admission is requested, he shall specify so much of it as is true and qualify or deny the remainder. An answering party may not give lack of information or knowledge as a reason for failure to admit or deny unless he states that he has made reasonable inquiry and that the information known or readily obtainable by him is insufficient to enable him to admit or deny. A party who considers that a matter of which an admission has been requested presents a genuine issue for trial may not, on that ground alone, object to the request; he may, subject to Rule 37(c), deny the matter or set forth reasons why he cannot admit or deny it.
The party who has requested the admissions may move to determine the sufficiency of the answers or objections. Unless the court determines that an objection is justified, it shall order that an answer be served. If the court determines that an answer does not comply with the requirements of this section, it may order either that the matter is admitted or that an amended answer be served. The court may, in lieu of these orders, determine that final disposition of the request be made at a pre-trial conference or at a designated time prior to trial. Rule 37(a)(4) applies to the award of expenses incurred in relation to the motion.
(b)Effect of Admission. Any matter admitted under this rule is conclusively established unless the court on motion permits withdrawal or amendment of the admission.
Subject to the provisions governing amendment of a pre-trial order, the court may permit withdrawal or amendment when the presentation of the merits of the action will be subserved thereby and the party who obtained the admission fails to satisfy the court that withdrawal or amendment will prejudice him in maintaining his action or defense on the merits. Any admission made by a party under this rule is for the purpose of the pending action only and is not an admission by him for any other purpose nor may it be used against him in any other proceeding.
Advisory Committee Notes
The purpose of Rule 36 is to identify and establish facts that are not in dispute. DeBlanc v. Stancil, 814 So. 2d 796, 802 (Miss. 2002). “[T]he requests must be reasonable and must be unambiguous. A request is ambiguous if the request is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation. The purpose of requests for admissions is to narrow and define issues for trial.” See Haley v. Harbin, 933 So. 2d 261, 262-63 (Miss. 2005). “Requests for admissions ‘should not be of such great number and broad scope as to cover all the issues [even] of a complex case, and [o]bviously…should not be sought in an attempt to harass an opposing party.’” See Haley, 933 So. 2d at 263.
Rule 36 will be enforced according to its terms; matters admitted or deemed admitted upon the responding party’s failure to timely respond are conclusively established unless the court, within its discretion, grants a motion to amend or withdraw the admission. “Any admission that is not amended or withdrawn cannot be rebutted by contrary testimony or ignored by the court even if the party against whom it is directed offers more credible evidence.” DeBlanc, 814 So. 2d at 801 (citing 7 James W. Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶36.03[2], at 36 (3d ed. 2001)). However, in the matter of child custody, the trial court may, as justice requires, allow the withdrawal of the issue admitted. Gilcrease v. Gilcrease, 918 So. 2d 854 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005).
The rule sets out a two-pronged test that trial courts may use when determining whether to grant a motion to withdraw or amend an admission. Courts may consider whether “presentation of the merits…will be subserved [by amendment or withdrawal] and whether the party who obtained the admission has satisfied the court that withdrawal or amendment would prejudice him or her…. [A] trial court ‘may,’ but is not required to, consider the two- pronged test in denying a motion to withdraw or amend.” See Young v. Smith, 67 So. 3d 732, 740 (Miss. 2011).
Generally, a party has no knowledge concerning the authenticity or admissibility of the opposing party’s medical records and, therefore, has no obligation to admit the authenticity or admissibility of such documents absent proper authentication of such records
in accordance with M.R.E. 901 or 902 and proper demonstration that such records are records of regularly conducted activity pursuant to M.R.E. 803(6). See Rhoda v. Weathers, 87 So. 3d 1036 (Miss. 2012).
Plain-English Summary
Rule 36(a) lets a party serve a written request asking another party to admit the truth of matters within Rule 26(b) discovery — statements or opinions of fact, the application of law to fact, or the genuineness of described documents — solely for purposes of the pending action. Copies of any documents referenced must be served with the request unless already made available. As with interrogatories, a request may be served on the plaintiff after the suit begins and on any other party with or after service of the summons.
Each matter must be set out separately, and it is deemed admitted unless the party served responds in writing within thirty days — or forty-five days if a defendant is responding after being served with the summons — with an answer or objection stating reasons. A denial must squarely address the substance of what was asked, and if only part of a matter is true, the answering party must admit that part and qualify or deny the rest. A party cannot plead lack of knowledge as an excuse without stating that it made a reasonable inquiry and that the information it could reasonably obtain is still not enough to admit or deny. Importantly, a party cannot object to a request solely because the matter presents a genuine issue for trial — it must instead deny the matter or explain why it cannot be admitted or denied. The requesting party can move the court to test the sufficiency of an answer or objection, and the court can order a better answer served or, if an objection is not justified, order it answered.
Subsection (b) makes clear what an admission means once it is made or deemed made: it is conclusively established in the case unless the court, on motion, permits it to be withdrawn or amended. The court weighs whether allowing the change would serve the merits of the case and whether the party who obtained the admission would be prejudiced in maintaining its claim or defense. An admission under this rule binds a party only for the pending action — it is not an admission for any other purpose and cannot be used against that party in a separate proceeding.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long do I have to respond to a request for admission in Mississippi?
Thirty days after service under Rule 36(a), except that a defendant responding after being served with the summons gets forty-five days. The court can shorten or lengthen either period.
What happens if I don't respond to a request for admission in time?
The matter is deemed admitted. Rule 36(a) treats silence past the deadline the same as an affirmative admission, so a missed response can hand the other side a fact they no longer have to prove.
Can I object to a request for admission just because it touches a disputed issue for trial?
No. Rule 36(a) specifically says a party cannot object on that ground alone; instead it must deny the matter or explain in detail why it cannot truthfully admit or deny it.
Once I admit something under Rule 36, is that permanent?
It is conclusively established for that case, but not necessarily forever. Rule 36(b) lets the court permit withdrawal or amendment of an admission, weighing whether that would serve the merits of the case and whether it would prejudice the party who obtained the admission.
Can an admission I make in one lawsuit be used against me in a different case?
No. Rule 36(b) limits any admission under this rule to the pending action; it is not an admission for any other purpose and cannot be used against the party in another proceeding.
Source & verification. Rule text and Advisory Committee Notes are
reproduced verbatim from the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure, adopted by the
Supreme Court of Mississippi. Last verified July 14, 2026.
· Official source
Also known as:ms requests for admission rulemississippi rfa deadline to respondrequest for admission deemed admitted mississippiwithdraw admission mississippi rule 36