Any protection from abuse (PFA) order that establishes or affects the custody or other parental rights of a minor child shall include a suggestion that one of the parties initiate an FM proceeding to establish a more permanent order regarding parental rights and responsibilities concerning the child. When the PFA order is inconsistent with an existing FM order, the PFA order shall suggest that one of the parties file a motion to amend the FM order. In determining whether to schedule a motion to amend that portion of a PFA order that establishes or affects the custody or other parental rights of a minor child, the court will consider the parties’ action or inaction with regard to the initiation of an FM proceeding.
Rule 127.Protection from Abuse Cases
Last amended February 1, 2024 · Last verified July 8, 2026
In one sentenceRule 127 requires a protection-from-abuse order affecting a minor child's custody or parental rights to suggest that a party start a Family Division proceeding for a more permanent order, or move to amend an existing Family Division order if the two orders conflict, and lets the court weigh the parties' action or inaction on that suggestion when deciding whether to schedule a motion to amend.
Full Text of Rule 127
Advisory Committee’s Notes & Reporter’s Notes
Advisory Note – February 2024
This Rule has been amended to incorporate changes to 4 M.R.S. § 152(5-A) made by Public Law 2023, chapter 63, “An Act to Clarify Court Jurisdiction of Actions Involving Children Brought Under the Maine Uniform Probate Code,” enacted by 131st Maine Legislature, which became effective on October 25, 2023. Former subdivision (a), “Handling of Any Pending Matters in Probate Court,” has been removed to eliminate protection from abuse matters as actions that would trigger District Court jurisdiction over a probate code matter filed in the Probate Court.
Advisory Note – July 2016
This new rule explains the role of the District Court when handling a PFA1 proceeding involving minor child(ren). By determining whether there are other cases pending in either another District Court location or in a Probate Court that address some aspect of parental rights and responsibilities concerning the minor child(ren), the court will have an improved ability to manage the multiple cases involving the child(ren). See also the July 2016 Advisory Notes to Rule 100.
Because a petition requesting a PFA order does not always result in the issuance of any order, and because the final hearings on PFA requests must be
1 Although 4 M.R.S. § 152(5-A) mentions protection from harassment cases as one of the possible
“proceedings involving custody or other parental rights,” a court has no authority to order parental rights and responsibilities under the protection from harassment statute. See 5 M.R.S. § 4655. heard within 21 days unless an extension is granted, the District Court is not required to contact the Probate Court to discuss the possible need for transfer for all PFAs. When a PFA is pending longer than 21 days, however, either because a temporary order is extended or because the court has granted a motion to continue or to consolidate the PFA matter with an FM case, the District Court must contact the Probate Court and determine when to transfer any cases pending there.
In addition, the rule requires the court to “encourage” the filing of a proceeding that would result in a more permanent order establishing parental rights and responsibilities. The FDTF 2014 report recommended that a motion to amend the parental rights and responsibilities or child support provisions of a PFA should “trigger a requirement to open a family matters case.” That recommendation has been addressed here by allowing the court to determine whether and how to schedule such a motion.
Last reviewed and edited October 7, 2021
Plain-English Summary
A protection-from-abuse order that establishes or affects a minor child's custody or other parental rights must suggest that one of the parties start a Family Division proceeding to set a more permanent order on parental rights and responsibilities. If the protection order conflicts with an existing Family Division order, it must instead suggest that a party move to amend the Family Division order. When deciding whether to schedule that motion to amend, the court considers what the parties have done, or failed to do, about starting a Family Division proceeding.
Frequently Asked Questions
What must a Maine protection-from-abuse order say about a minor child's custody?
If it establishes or affects the child's custody or parental rights, it must suggest that a party start a Family Division proceeding for a more permanent order, or move to amend an existing Family Division order if the two conflict.
Does the court consider whether a party acted on that suggestion?
Yes. In deciding whether to schedule a motion to amend the protection order's custody provisions, the court weighs the parties' action or inaction on starting a Family Division proceeding.
Source & verification. The rule text and Advisory Committee’s Notes / Reporter’s
Notes are reproduced verbatim from the official Maine Rules of Civil Procedure (Me. R. Civ. P. 127), prescribed by the
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine (4 M.R.S. § 8, the Rules Enabling Act). The plain-English summary is original and written by us. Last verified July 8, 2026. ·
Official source
Also known as: protection from abuse custody order MainePFA order parental rights Maine