Rule 100.Scope of the Family Division Rules
Last amended June 1, 2026 · Last verified July 8, 2026
Full Text of Rule 100
Version 1
Version 2
Advisory Committee’s Notes & Reporter’s Notes
Advisory Note - July 2016
The language added reflects the expanded jurisdiction granted to the District Courts pursuant to Public Law 2015, chapter 460, “An Act To Ensure a Continuing Home Court for Cases Involving Children,” enacted by the 127th Maine Legislature, which became effective on July 29, 2016. Pursuant to that legislative act, the District Court now has jurisdiction over adoption, guardianship, and name change petitions involving minor children when there is a pending proceeding involving the child in the District Court (such as a divorce, child protection, or paternity matter). In those circumstances, the District Court becomes the child’s “home court” and has exclusive jurisdiction over all of the pending matters involving the child. See 4 M.R.S. § 152(5-A).
Advisory Notes — June 2008
Rule 100 governs the scope of Chapter XIII for cases now within the exclusive jurisdiction of the District Court. The rule is derived from Rule 80(a) and FAM DIV I.A. The listing of covered subjects is based on the current Family Division Rules. Although child protection, protection from abuse, and juvenile actions also involve families, such actions have specialized and unique procedures. Those procedures are significantly different from actions that have historically been referred to as family matters. As a result, it was determined that at this time, it would be more appropriate to exclude those actions from the general Family Division Rules. The first paragraph recognizes that the District Court has exclusive jurisdiction over such matters, but also recognizes the possibility that there may be a state constitutional right to a jury trial on certain limited issues within these cases. The rule uses the term “parentage actions” to recognize de facto parents. See, e.g., Young v. Young, 2004 ME 44, 845 A.2d 1144; C.E.W. v. D.E.W., 2004 ME 43, 845 A.2d 1146; Stitham v. Henderson, 2001 ME 52, 768 A.2d 598; Merchant v. Bussell, 139 Me. 118, 27 A.2d 816 (1942). Parties raising de facto parentage issues must conform to the provisions of this chapter.
Although not restated here, this chapter promotes the goals of the Family Division provided in FAM DIV II.B.1 Rule 100 outlines the mission
The goals of the Family Division as stated in Fam. Div. II.B. have been: 1. To promote a timely resolution of family cases. 2. To address promptly the establishment or modification of child support and to promptly enforce compliance with support orders and all other orders in family cases. 3. To provide effective case management for family cases involving children. 4. To facilitate parenting arrangements in the best interest of children at an early stage in the proceedings. of the Family Division which is that the rules shall be construed to provide a system of justice that is responsive to the needs of families and the support of their children as stated in 4 M.R.S. § 183. See also, FAM DIV II.A.
Matters not addressed in the Family Division Rules are governed by the other provisions of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure.
5. To promote education for the parties about parenting issues and to inform litigants about community services available to help them address family problems. 6. To provide court users with a better understanding of court processes. 7. To identify domestic relations cases in which there is domestic abuse or a power imbalance in order to protect children and adults and to ensure a fair resolution of the case. 8. To promote civility in divorce and other family law proceedings. 9. To minimize the harm to children caused by family law cases. 10. To make appropriate referrals to alternative dispute resolution services.
Advisory Note – June 2026
Rule 100 is amended, together with Rule 101(c), in response to Public Law 2025, chapter 158 (codified at 19-A M.R.S. § 4103(2)), which allows minors to commence protection from abuse proceedings on their own. This rule is also amended to clarify that the only Family Division Rule in Chapter XIII of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure that applies to child protection cases is Rule 129.
Advisory Note - July 2016
The language added reflects the expanded jurisdiction granted to the District Courts pursuant to Public Law 2015, chapter 460, “An Act To Ensure a Continuing Home Court for Cases Involving Children,” enacted by the 127th Maine Legislature, which became effective on July 29, 2016. Pursuant to that legislative act, the District Court now has jurisdiction over adoption, guardianship, and name change petitions involving minor children when there is a pending proceeding involving the child in the District Court (such as a divorce, child protection, or paternity matter). In those circumstances, the District Court becomes the child’s “home court” and has exclusive jurisdiction over all of the pending matters involving the child. See 4 M.R.S. § 152(5-A).
Advisory Notes — June 2008
Rule 100 governs the scope of Chapter XIII for cases now within the exclusive jurisdiction of the District Court. The rule is derived from Rule 80(a) and FAM DIV I.A. The listing of covered subjects is based on the current Family Division Rules. Although child protection, protection from abuse, and juvenile actions also involve families, such actions have specialized and unique procedures. Those procedures are significantly different from actions that have historically been referred to as family matters. As a result, it was determined that at this time, it would be more appropriate to exclude those actions from the general Family Division Rules.
The first paragraph recognizes that the District Court has exclusive jurisdiction over such matters, but also recognizes the possibility that there may be a state constitutional right to a jury trial on certain limited issues within these cases.
The rule uses the term “parentage actions” to recognize de facto parents. See, e.g., Young v. Young, 2004 ME 44, 845 A.2d 1144; C.E.W. v. D.E.W., 2004 ME 43, 845 A.2d 1146; Stitham v. Henderson, 2001 ME 52, 768 A.2d 598; Merchant v. Bussell, 139 Me. 118, 27 A.2d 816 (1942). Parties raising de facto parentage issues must conform to the provisions of this chapter. Although not restated here, this chapter promotes the goals of the Family Division provided in FAM DIV II.B.1 Rule 100 outlines the mission of the Family Division which is that the rules shall be construed to provide a system of justice that is responsive to the needs of families and the support of their children as stated in 4 M.R.S. § 183. See also, FAM DIV II.A.
Matters not addressed in the Family Division Rules are governed by the other provisions of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure.
1 The goals of the Family Division as stated in Fam. Div. II.B. have been:
1. To promote a timely resolution of family cases. 2. To address promptly the establishment or modification of child support and to promptly enforce compliance with support orders and all other orders in family cases. 3. To provide effective case management for family cases involving children. 4. To facilitate parenting arrangements in the best interest of children at an early stage in the proceedings. 5. To promote education for the parties about parenting issues and to inform litigants about community services available to help them address family problems. 6. To provide court users with a better understanding of court processes. 7. To identify domestic relations cases in which there is domestic abuse or a power imbalance in order to protect children and adults and to ensure a fair resolution of the case. 8. To promote civility in divorce and other family law proceedings. 9. To minimize the harm to children caused by family law cases. 10. To make appropriate referrals to alternative dispute resolution services.
Plain-English Summary
The Family Division Rules cover divorce, annulment, judicial separation, paternity or parentage, parental rights and responsibilities, child support, guardianship, adoption, name change, emancipation, grandparent visitation, and any post-judgment motion arising from those actions, along with post-judgment motions the Superior Court may still hear in matters that were pending or concluded there on or before December 31, 2000 and were never transferred to the District Court. The District Court has exclusive jurisdiction over these actions, except that an issue carrying a constitutional right to a jury trial can be transferred to the Superior Court for that purpose under Rule 76, and references to “the court” throughout the chapter include District Court judges, Superior Court justices, and Family Law Magistrates unless stated otherwise. The Maine Rules of Civil Procedure fill any gap this chapter doesn't address, and the whole chapter is meant to be read as building a system of justice responsive to families and the children affected by it.
Effective June 1, 2026, the rule was amended to update its cross-references, replacing an earlier reference to the child-protection Probate Court transfer procedure with references to Rule 101(c)'s treatment of minor protection-from-abuse plaintiffs and Rule 129's procedure for children placed in a qualified residential treatment program.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which kinds of cases does the Family Division handle under Rule 100?
Divorce, annulment, judicial separation, parentage, parental rights and responsibilities, child support, guardianship, adoption, name change, emancipation, grandparent visitation, and post-judgment motions arising from any of those actions.
Can a party get a jury trial in a Family Division case?
Only if the issue carries a constitutional right to a jury trial, in which case it can be transferred to the Superior Court for that purpose under Rule 76 upon a proper and timely request.
Does the Superior Court still handle any Family Division matters?
Only a narrow category: post-judgment motions in actions that were pending or concluded in the Superior Court on or before December 31, 2000 and were never transferred to the District Court.