RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 59.New trial; altering or amending a judgment

Title VIII: Post-Judgment Procedure · Last amended July 1, 2016 · Last verified July 14, 2026

In one sentenceRule 59 lists the grounds on which a court may order a new trial or alter a judgment, and sets the strict deadlines and evidentiary support each kind of motion requires.

Full Text of Rule 59

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)

(a) In general.
(1) Grounds for a new trial. The court may, on motion, grant a new trial on all or some of the issues, and to any party, for any of the following reasons:
(A) irregularity in the proceedings of the court, jury or adverse party;
(B) any order of the court or abuse of discretion by which either party was prevented from having a fair trial;
(C) misconduct of the jury;
(D) accident or surprise, which ordinary prudence could not have guarded against;
(E) newly discovered evidence, material for the party making the application, which the party could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered and produced at the trial;
(F) excessive damages or inadequate damages, appearing to have been given under the influence of passion or prejudice;
(G) insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict or other decision, or that it is against the law; or
(H) error in law, occurring at the trial.
(2) Support for motion. Any motion for a new trial based upon any of the grounds set forth in subdivisions (A) - (E) must be accompanied by an affidavit stating in detail the facts relied upon in support of the motion. Any motion based on subdivisions (G) or (H) must set forth with particularity the factual grounds for the motion.
(3) Further action after a non-jury trial. On a motion for new trial in an action tried without a jury, the court may open the judgment, if one has been entered, take additional testimony, amend findings of fact and conclusions of law or make new findings and conclusions, and direct the entry of a new judgment.
(b) Time to file a motion for a new trial. A motion for a new trial must be filed and served within 14 days after the entry of the judgment.
(c) Time to serve affidavits. When a motion for a new trial is based on affidavits, they must be filed and served with the motion. The opposing party has 14 days after being served to file and serve opposing affidavits, which period may be extended for up to an additional 21 days by order of the court or written stipulation. The court may permit reply affidavits. All affidavits filed under this rule must meet the requirements of Rule 56(c)(4).
(d) New trial on the court's initiative or for reasons not in the motion.
(1) On court's own initiative. No later than 14 days after entry of judgment the court, on its own, may give notice of its intent order a new trial for any reason for which it might have granted a new trial on motion of a party. A notice of intent pursuant to this subdivision is to be treated as a motion for new trial filed by a party for the purpose of these rules and the Idaho Appellate Rules.
(2) For grounds not stated in motion. The court may grant a motion for a new trial, timely served, for a reason not stated in the motion.
The court must give the parties notice and an opportunity to be heard before entering an order for new trial. The court must specify in the order the grounds for granting a new trial.
(e) Motion to alter or amend a judgment. A motion to alter or amend the judgment must be filed and served no later than 14 days after entry of the judgment.

Amendment History

(Adopted March 1, 2016, effective July 1, 2016.)

Plain-English Summary

Rule 59 gives a losing party a path to challenge the outcome of a trial without going straight to an appeal. The grounds run from procedural problems, like jury misconduct or an unfair ruling that kept a party from a fair trial, to substantive ones, like a verdict unsupported by the evidence, damages driven by passion or prejudice, or a legal error at trial. Newly discovered evidence and honest surprise that diligence could not have prevented round out the list. In a case tried without a jury, the court has extra options: it can reopen the judgment, hear more evidence, and rewrite its findings and conclusions before entering a new judgment.

Not every ground gets the same treatment. Motions resting on trial irregularities, unfair rulings, jury misconduct, surprise, or newly discovered evidence must come with a detailed affidavit laying out the supporting facts. Motions arguing the evidence was insufficient or that the law was misapplied instead need a particular statement of the factual grounds. Every deadline in this rule is unforgiving: a motion for new trial must be filed within 14 days of judgment, a motion to alter or amend the judgment follows the same 14-day clock, and opposing affidavits are due 14 days after being served, though a court can add up to 21 more days. A court can also order a new trial on its own within 14 days of judgment, or grant a motion for reasons the party never raised, but only after giving everyone notice and a chance to be heard.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main grounds for a new trial under Rule 59?

They include irregularities in the proceedings, an unfair ruling or abuse of discretion, jury misconduct, unavoidable accident or surprise, newly discovered evidence, excessive or inadequate damages from passion or prejudice, insufficient evidence, and legal error at trial.

How long does a party have to file a motion for a new trial?

The motion must be filed and served within 14 days after entry of the judgment. The same 14-day deadline applies to a motion to alter or amend the judgment.

Does a motion for new trial always need a supporting affidavit?

Only for certain grounds. Motions based on irregularities, unfair rulings, jury misconduct, surprise, or newly discovered evidence need a detailed affidavit. Motions arguing insufficient evidence or legal error instead need a particular statement of the factual grounds, not an affidavit.

Can a court order a new trial without anyone asking for one?

Yes, within 14 days after entry of judgment the court can give notice of its intent to order a new trial on its own for any reason that would have justified granting one on a party's motion.

What extra options does a judge have after a bench trial?

In a case tried without a jury, the court may reopen an entered judgment, take more testimony, revise or add findings of fact and conclusions of law, and then direct entry of a new judgment.

Source & verification. Rule text are reproduced verbatim from the Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure, adopted by the Supreme Court of Idaho. Last verified July 14, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: motion for new trialmotion to alter or amend judgmentnewly discovered evidence new trialexcessive damages new trialrule 59 idahonew trial deadline