Rule 45.Subpoenas
Title VI: Alternative Dispute Resolution and Trial · Last amended July 1, 2016 · Last verified July 14, 2026
Full Text of Rule 45
Comment
The Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act (the Act) has been adopted as Rule 45(j) of the Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure to enable an attorney prosecuting or defending a lawsuit outside the jurisdiction of Idaho to conduct discovery within Idaho. The rule does not apply to discovery arising out of litigation originating in foreign countries. The term 'Subpoena' includes a subpoena duces tecum. The description of a subpoena is based on the language of Rule 45 of the FRCP. The term 'Subpoena' does not include a subpoena for the inspection of a person (subsection 45(j)(2)(E)(iii) is limited to inspection of premises). Medical examinations in a personal injury case, for example, are separately controlled by state discovery rules (the corresponding State rule is Rule 35 of the IRCP). The term 'Court of Record' was chosen to exclude non-court of record proceedings from the ambit of the rule. A 'Court of Record' includes anyone who is authorized to issue a subpoena under the laws of that state, which may include an attorney of record for a party in the proceeding.
Submitting a subpoena to the clerk of court in Idaho, so that a subpoena is then issued in the name of Idaho, is the necessary act that invokes the jurisdiction of Idaho, which in turn makes the newly issued subpoena both enforceable and challengeable in Idaho. The standard procedure under this section will become as follows, using as an example a case filed in Kansas (the trial state) where the witness to be deposed lives in Idaho (the discovery state): A lawyer of record for a party in the action pending in Kansas will issue a subpoena in Kansas (the same way lawyers in Kansas routinely issue subpoenas in pending actions). The lawyer will then prepare an Idaho subpoena so that it conforms to the requirements of the Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure and may also incorporate the same terms of the Kansas subpoena so long as they conform to the Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure. The lawyer will then hire a process server (or local counsel) in Idaho, who will take the completed and executed Kansas subpoena and the completed but not yet executed Idaho subpoena to the clerk's office in Idaho. In addition, the lawyer might prepare a short transmittal letter to accompany the Kansas subpoena, advising the clerk that an Idaho subpoena is being sought pursuant to Idaho Rule 45(j)(3). The clerk of court, upon being given the Kansas subpoena, will then issue the Idaho subpoena ('issue' includes signing and stamping). The process server (or other agent of the party) will then serve the Idaho subpoena on the deponent in accordance with Idaho law (which includes any applicable local rules). The act of the clerk of court is ministerial, yet is sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of Idaho over the deponent. The only documents that need to be presented to the clerk of court in Idaho are the subpoena issued in the trial state and the draft subpoena of Idaho. There is no requirement to hire local counsel to have the subpoena issued in Idaho, and there is no need to present the matter to a judge in Idaho before the subpoena can be issued. However, the rule requires that the Idaho subpoena 'conform to the requirements of the Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure, including Rule 45, and conform substantially to the form provided in Rule 45(c)...' In effect, the clerk of court in Idaho issues the new subpoena which is then served on the deponent in accordance with the laws of Idaho. The process is simple and efficient, costs are kept to a minimum, and local counsel and judicial participation are unnecessary to have the subpoena issued and served in Idaho. The rule requires that, when the subpoena is served, it contain or be accompanied by the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all counsel of record and of any party not represented by counsel. This requirement imposes no significant burden on the lawyer obtaining the subpoena, given that the lawyer already has the obligation to send a notice of deposition to every counsel of record and any unrepresented parties. The benefits to Idaho, by contrast, are substantial. This requirement makes it easy for the deponent (or, as will frequently be the case, the deponent's lawyer) to learn the names of and contact the other lawyers in the case. This requirement can easily be met, since the subpoena will contain or be accompanied by the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all counsel of record and of any party not represented by counsel (which is the same information that will ordinarily be contained on a notice of deposition and proof of service).
The Idaho court clerk will not create a file when discovery is initiated nor collect a fee. This rule places the obligation of retaining the original subpoena and the proof of service on the lawyer initiating the discovery. A file will be created if a motion is brought to enforce, quash, or modify the subpoena.
The rule requires that any application to the court for a protective order, or to enforce, quash, or modify a subpoena, or for any other dispute relating to discovery under this rule, must comply with the law of Idaho. Those laws include Idaho's procedural, evidentiary, and conflict of laws rules. Idaho has a significant interest in protecting its residents who become non-party witnesses in an action pending in a foreign jurisdiction from any unreasonable or unduly burdensome discovery requests, and this is easily accomplished by requiring that any discovery motions must be decided under the laws of Idaho. This protects the deponent by requiring that all applications to the court that directly affect the deponent must be made in Idaho.
Amendment History
(Adopted March 1, 2016, effective July 1, 2016.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 45 is the mechanical backbone for compelling testimony and documents from people who are not eager to hand them over voluntarily. A subpoena has to identify the issuing court and the case, and it can command a person to appear and testify, to produce or permit inspection of documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit inspection of premises -- either alone or paired with a command to appear. The clerk issues a signed, sealed subpoena at a party's request, leaving the party to fill in the details, and an Idaho-licensed attorney can also issue and sign one directly. Serving it takes a non-party adult delivering a copy and, if attendance is required, tendering a day's witness fee and mileage, with an exception for subpoenas issued on behalf of the State. Producing documents means turning them over as they are kept in the ordinary course of business, or organized to match the categories demanded; producing electronically stored information follows similar default rules about form, and a person need not produce the same data twice or dig up information that is not reasonably accessible without a court order finding good cause.
Because a subpoena can reach beyond the parties to the lawsuit, Rule 45 gives the person served real protection. A court can quash or modify a subpoena that is unreasonable, oppressive, gives too little time to comply, demands privileged or protected material without an exception, or imposes an undue burden, and it can condition compliance on prepayment of the cost of production. A person withholding material as privileged has to say so and describe what is being withheld well enough for the requesting party to evaluate the claim, and if privileged material slips through anyway, the receiving party has to return, sequester, or destroy it once notified, pending resolution of the claim. Ignoring a subpoena without an adequate excuse can be treated as contempt of the issuing court.
Rule 45(j) is the one part of this rule that carries genuine official commentary from the Idaho Supreme Court, because it adopts the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act -- a mechanism for lawyers litigating a case outside Idaho to gather testimony or evidence from Idaho witnesses. Rather than filing a new Idaho lawsuit or hiring local counsel just to get a subpoena issued, the out-of-state lawyer submits the foreign subpoena to the clerk of the Idaho county where the witness or evidence is located, along with a proposed Idaho subpoena that mirrors it and conforms to Idaho's rules. The clerk's role at that stage is administrative -- no case file opens, no fee is charged, and the clerk does not keep the proof of service, which instead goes back to the attorney who requested the subpoena. A real Idaho court file, and a real Idaho judge, only enter the picture if a dispute arises: a motion to enforce, quash, modify, or seek a protective order gets filed and decided under Idaho law in the county where the discovery is happening, which is the mechanism Idaho uses to make sure its own residents are not exposed to discovery demands that Idaho law itself would consider unreasonable or overly burdensome.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who can issue a subpoena in an Idaho civil case?
The clerk of the court where the case is pending issues a signed, sealed subpoena at a party's request, though the party has to fill in the details before service. An Idaho-licensed attorney, acting as an officer of the court, can also issue and sign a subpoena directly without going through the clerk.
Can a court refuse to enforce a subpoena that is too broad or burdensome?
Yes. On timely motion, the court can quash or modify a subpoena that is unreasonable or oppressive, fails to give enough time to comply, demands privileged or otherwise protected material without an applicable exception, or subjects the person to undue burden. The court can also condition compliance on prepayment of reasonable production costs.
What happens if I accidentally produce privileged documents in response to a subpoena?
Once you notify the receiving party of the claim and its basis, that party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the material and any copies, stop using or disclosing it, and take reasonable steps to retrieve it if it was already shared -- while you preserve the material until a court resolves the privilege claim, which either side may present to the court under seal.
What is the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act, and why does Rule 45(j) matter?
It is a model law, adopted here as Rule 45(j), that lets a lawyer handling a lawsuit pending in another state obtain an Idaho subpoena for a witness or evidence located in Idaho, by submitting the foreign subpoena to an Idaho clerk of court rather than filing a new Idaho case or hiring local counsel. It applies only to discovery tied to litigation in another U.S. state, tribe, or territory -- not to cases filed in foreign countries.
Does submitting a foreign subpoena under Rule 45(j) mean a lawsuit has now been filed in Idaho?
No. Submitting the foreign subpoena to the clerk does not count as an appearance in Idaho courts, and the clerk does not open a case file or collect a fee at that stage. A file only opens if a party later moves to enforce, quash, or modify the subpoena, or seeks a protective order, at which point Idaho law and an Idaho court take over that specific dispute.