Rule 1.951.Judgment defined
Division IX: Trial and Judgment · Last amended February 15, 2002 · Last verified July 15, 2026
Full Text of Rule 1.951
Plain-English Summary
Rule 1.951 keeps things plain: a judgment is any final adjudication of the parties' rights in the action. It does not matter how the case got there — a verdict, a default, a ruling on the pleadings, or a summary judgment can all produce a judgment, so long as the ruling finally settles those rights.
The rule's value is in what it sets up. Once a ruling counts as a judgment, deadlines start running for post-judgment motions and appeals, and the judgment becomes something a party can enforce or appeal. The rules that follow — on partial judgments, judgments against some parties only, entry, and costs — all assume this same core definition.
Frequently Asked Questions
What separates a “judgment” from an ordinary court order?
Finality. Rule 1.951 defines a judgment as a final adjudication of the parties' rights, while many orders resolve procedural matters along the way without finally deciding those rights.
Does Rule 1.951 tell me how to get a judgment entered?
No. It only defines what a judgment is. The specific paths to one — default, judgment on the pleadings, summary judgment, or judgment on a verdict — are covered in other rules in this division.
Is a judgment only something that happens after a jury trial?
No. Any final adjudication of the parties' rights qualifies, whether it follows a jury verdict, a bench decision, a default, or a pretrial motion.
Why does it matter whether a ruling counts as a judgment?
Because that status triggers post-judgment deadlines, appeal rights, and enforcement mechanisms that do not apply to routine interlocutory orders.
Where does the rule requiring a judgment to be entered on the record appear?
Rule 1.959 requires that every judgment and order be entered on the record and clearly specify the relief granted.