Rule 1.234.Necessary parties; joinder
Division II: Actions, Joinder of Actions and Parties · Last amended February 15, 2002 · Last verified July 15, 2026
Full Text of Rule 1.234
Plain-English Summary
Rule 1.234 works in three connected pieces. The first, labeled the remedy for nonjoinder as plaintiff, generally requires people who share a joint interest in an action to be joined on the same side. But it builds in an escape valve: if a person with that joint interest will not join as a plaintiff, they can instead be made a defendant. This provision does not apply to class actions under rules 1.261 to 1.279, and it does not affect the separate options Iowa Code sections 613.1 and 613.2 permit.
The second piece defines what makes a party indispensable. A party is indispensable under Rule 1.234 if their interest cannot be separated from the case and their absence would prevent the court from rendering any judgment between the parties already before it, or if, even without that party present, a judgment between the existing parties would necessarily affect that absent party's interest inequitably.
The third piece tells the court what to do when an indispensable party is missing. The court must order that party brought in. If the court can obtain jurisdiction over people who are not indispensable but should be parties for complete relief — through service of original notice in any manner the rules or a statute allow — it must order their names added and notice served. But if jurisdiction over an absent party can be had only through their consent or voluntary appearance, the court may still proceed and decide the case, though the resulting judgment will not affect that absent person's rights or liabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if someone with a joint interest in my claim refuses to join as a co-plaintiff?
Rule 1.234 lets you make that person a defendant instead of forcing them to be a co-plaintiff against their will.
What makes a party 'indispensable' under this rule?
Rule 1.234 defines an indispensable party as one whose interest is not severable and whose absence would prevent the court from rendering any judgment between the parties before it, or one whose absent interest would necessarily be inequitably affected by a judgment rendered without them.
What must the court do if an indispensable party has not been brought into the case?
Rule 1.234 requires the court to order that indispensable party brought in.
What happens if the court cannot get jurisdiction over a party except through their consent?
Rule 1.234 lets the court proceed with the hearing and determination of the case, but the resulting judgment will not affect that absent party's rights or liabilities.
Does this rule apply to class actions?
No. Rule 1.234 states that its provision on nonjoinder as plaintiff does not apply to class actions under rules 1.261 to 1.279, and it does not affect the options permitted by Iowa Code sections 613.1 and 613.2.