Rule 1.1503.Endorsing refusal
Division XV: Injunctions · Last amended February 15, 2002 · Last verified July 15, 2026
Full Text of Rule 1.1503
Plain-English Summary
Rule 1.1503 covers what happens when a court, or a justice of the Iowa Supreme Court, turns down a request for a temporary injunction. The judge does not need to write a separate order explaining the decision — the rule requires only that the refusal be endorsed on the petition itself. That endorsement becomes part of the record of the case, showing that the relief was sought and denied.
This matters because Rule 1.1504 requires anyone who later renews the same request, or takes it to a different judge, to disclose that a previous court or justice already refused it. The endorsement on the petition is the paper trail that makes that disclosure enforceable — a party cannot quietly shop the same request from judge to judge without leaving a record of the earlier refusal.
Because the rule speaks of a court, or justice of the supreme court, it covers both the everyday case of a district judge declining to issue a temporary injunction and the less common situation where a request goes directly to a justice of the supreme court. Either way, the same endorsement requirement applies.
Frequently Asked Questions
What must a judge do if a temporary injunction is refused?
Rule 1.1503 requires the court, or the justice of the supreme court who is asked, to endorse the refusal on the petition itself, creating a record that the request was made and denied.
Does the judge have to explain the reasons for refusing a temporary injunction?
The rule does not require a written explanation — it requires only that the refusal be endorsed on the petition. Nothing stops a judge from adding reasons, but the rule's own requirement is limited to that endorsement.
Why does it matter that the refusal is written on the petition?
It creates the paper trail Rule 1.1504 relies on: any later petition seeking the same relief must disclose whether an earlier court or justice already refused it, and the endorsement on the original petition is what makes that disclosure verifiable.
Does this rule apply if I take my request straight to a justice of the supreme court?
Yes. Rule 1.1503 applies to a refusal by either a court or a justice of the supreme court, so the endorsement requirement follows the request wherever it is presented.
Can I ask a different judge for the same temporary injunction after one judge refuses it?
The rule does not itself forbid presenting a renewed request, but Rule 1.1504 requires the new petition, or your attorney, to disclose the earlier refusal, including who refused it and when.